From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B78D5689 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:30:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2016 01:30:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,724,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="36138540" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2016 01:29:59 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx154.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.70) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:29:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by FMSMSX154.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:29:59 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.239]) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.218]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:29:57 +0800 From: "Wei, FangfangX" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Xu, Qian Q" CC: "ci@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Yong" Thread-Topic: Intel PerPatch Build Thread-Index: AQHSSV9qp0GiXMJwnEircgtcYseghaDu0GSAgABai4CAAWgAAIAAHP4AgAAOroCAAAXhgIABhVKAgAAHXQCAAIaOUA== Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:29:56 +0000 Message-ID: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE9143F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <587443$9qu68@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> <1683099.tRCFP3oIjm@xps13> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927B1A6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <3298229.S52HG4ql9W@xps13> In-Reply-To: <3298229.S52HG4ql9W@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjRkOWNhZGQtYzU3MC00ZGRjLWEyOWEtN2M0ODNhNzE1MzRmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkRTK29kekw4KzRVWVFNak9oWjgrYTNNdzlUTGptMVQzbm9OUkFnSDVuZTQ9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:30:01 -0000 Hi Thomas, Sorry for the late reply, I was working on other tasks these days, and will= start to try your scripts ASAP. Best Regards Fangfang Wei -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]=20 Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:27 PM To: Xu, Qian Q Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Wei, FangfangX ; Liu, Yong Subject: Re: Intel PerPatch Build 2016-12-01 09:00, Xu, Qian Q: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > 2016-11-30 09:25, Xu, Qian Q: > > > Then the conclusion is that we just kept current model, 1 report for = 1 patch, > > right? > >=20 > > Yes > > Thanks for the discussion > > (I keep this discussion in mind in case it needs some improvement) > >=20 > > > Also keep in mind some things about the error comparison, we can disc= uss it > > again if we see many these issues. > >=20 > > Yes > >=20 > > > As to the next step, I think Fangfang can check how to update the per= patch > > build result to the patchwork to make the result more visible/readable = in website. > >=20 > > Yes please. > > I'm also waiting to apply the patches. Should I apply them right now? > >=20 > Do you mean your script patches? I think fangfang may give some comments = here.=20 Yes please