From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D3D58CE for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:47:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2016 01:47:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,724,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1093072027" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2016 01:47:39 -0800 Received: from FMSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:47:39 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by fmsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:47:39 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.239]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.142]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:47:37 +0800 From: "Wei, FangfangX" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Xu, Qian Q" , Yuanhan Liu CC: "Cao, Waterman" , "ci@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-ci] |SUCCESS| [PATCH 2/3] maintainers: update virtio section name Thread-Index: AQHSS7I/7/bdMUOJAU+XMwTYHF8riaDy08Sg Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:47:36 +0000 Message-ID: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE91496@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480575999-14453-3-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <20161201072518.GB24403@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927AFFC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1606552.mGUOoSz4ly@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1606552.mGUOoSz4ly@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNDVhMzk1ZjYtZjQ5NS00YTljLWJhMDQtODkwODY2MjU2YjdmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IjdvakJjRTF2anREcjRIa3ZUSkRVbDJRdjdPbDRueDZScnVYbHh0MTNqUE09In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_003_067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE91496SHSMSX101ccrcor_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] |SUCCESS| [PATCH 2/3] maintainers: update virtio section name X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:47:42 -0000 --_003_067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE91496SHSMSX101ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Thomas, I can receive the checkpatch email no matter the result is success or warni= ng. Through the attached email, we can see the receiver is test-report@dpdk.org= and cc to the author, no matter what the result is. And above two patches are send to the mailing list dev@dpdk.org. I think currently the checkpatch email has not been done according to the s= tatus of the message sent to different recipients. Best Regards Fangfang Wei -----Original Message----- From: ci [mailto:ci-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:06 PM To: Xu, Qian Q ; Yuanhan Liu Cc: Cao, Waterman ; ci@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] |SUCCESS| [PATCH 2/3] maintainers: update virtio sec= tion name 2016-12-01 08:44, Xu, Qian Q: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 08:06:41AM +0100, checkpatch@dpdk.org wrote: > > > Test-Label: checkpatch > > > Test-Status: SUCCESS > > > http://dpdk.org/patch/17348 > > > > > > _coding style OK_ > >=20 > > Great! This kind of emails is something I'd like to see for a while. > > But I don't like to receive SUCCESS notice. Normally, I'm positive=20 > > my patches are well qualified. The SUCCESS notice only makes my inbox f= at-er but nothing else. It is a bug. If the email has the list-id dev.dpdk.org, success should not be reported t= o the author. > > Of course, I'd like to receive failure notices if any. > Thomas is the owner for the check patch, I wonder if Thomas can add one b= utton or provide options for the patch submitters to receive the mails or n= ot.=20 > Generally developer may not want to receive the SUCCESS mail, but some=20 > may want to receive the mail to make sure the test is done and all pass. = We may not simply disable all SUCCESS mails, instead we'd better provide ch= oice for people. If the patch is directly sent to checkpatch@dpdk.org, the author receive th= e report (success or failure). If the patch is sent to the mailing list, he receives only the failure and = can check success on patchwork. I don't see the point of receiving success reports if it is public. --_003_067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE91496SHSMSX101ccrcor_ Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: attachment; creation-date="Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:47:36 GMT"; modification-date="Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:47:36 GMT" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:07:28 +0800 Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com (10.7.209.21) by fmsmsx104-1.cps.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 23:07:18 -0800 Received: from fmsmga102.fm.intel.com ([10.1.193.69]) by orsmga002-1.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2016 23:06:48 -0800 Received: from dpdk.org ([92.243.14.124]) by mga11.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2016 23:06:45 -0800 Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945A86932; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:06:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 8FA8168A5; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:06:44 +0100 (CET) From: "checkpatch@dpdk.org" To: "test-report@dpdk.org" CC: Yuanhan Liu Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| [PATCH 3/3] maintainers: add stable mailing list Thread-Topic: [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| [PATCH 3/3] maintainers: add stable mailing list Thread-Index: AQHSS6GTMfSn74NEqESoWS7NwRnsAA== Sender: test-report Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:06:44 +0000 Message-ID: <20161201070644.8FA8168A5@dpdk.org> References: <1480575999-14453-4-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <1480575999-14453-4-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (mga11.intel.com: domain of postmaster@dpdk.org designates 92.243.14.124 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=92.243.14.124; receiver=mga11.intel.com; envelope-from="test-report-bounces@dpdk.org"; x-sender="postmaster@dpdk.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible.downgrade_pra; x-record-type="v=spf1" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: SUCCESS http://dpdk.org/patch/17349 _coding style OK_ --_003_067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE91496SHSMSX101ccrcor_ Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: attachment; creation-date="Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:47:36 GMT"; modification-date="Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:47:36 GMT" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:04:27 +0800 Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com (10.253.24.32) by FMSMSX106-1.cps.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:04:25 -0800 Received: from orsmga103.jf.intel.com ([10.7.208.35]) by fmsmga005-1.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2016 18:04:02 -0800 Received: from dpdk.org ([92.243.14.124]) by mga03.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2016 18:03:38 -0800 Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5110B379E; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 03:03:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 9453E379B; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 03:03:06 +0100 (CET) From: "checkpatch@dpdk.org" To: "test-report@dpdk.org" CC: "Wu, Jingjing" Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| [PATCH v2] net/i40evf: fix casting between structs Thread-Topic: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| [PATCH v2] net/i40evf: fix casting between structs Thread-Index: AQHSSq4UctFYWHuEy0u28NsKj9ilpQ== Sender: test-report Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:03:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20161130020306.9453E379B@dpdk.org> References: <1480471345-95458-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <1480471345-95458-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (mga03.intel.com: domain of postmaster@dpdk.org designates 92.243.14.124 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=92.243.14.124; receiver=mga03.intel.com; envelope-from="test-report-bounces@dpdk.org"; x-sender="postmaster@dpdk.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible.downgrade_pra; x-record-type="v=spf1" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/17336 _coding style issues_ WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate= line #91: FILE: drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c:1364: + * i40e_aq_send_msg_to_vf in PF driver.*/ total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 66 lines checked --_003_067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346BE91496SHSMSX101ccrcor_--