From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEDC20F for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:29:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2016 00:29:08 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,340,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="797403630" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2016 00:29:07 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:29:05 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:29:05 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.11]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:29:02 +0800 From: "Wei, FangfangX" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "Mcnamara, John" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Xu, Qian Q" , "Liu, Yong" , "Chen, WeichunX" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4 7/7] tests: add checkpatch Thread-Index: AQHSTvs6nSM4jn92akWd6gn3UCZF/6D6ch+A//+iiACAAeZw8P//uoEAgAHfJPD///BIgAA0CAbQ//+wh4D/+v1RYP/1vF9ggBQI6gD//gPW4A== Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:29:01 +0000 Message-ID: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CD7AD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480599892-14190-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CB280@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CB299@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <2218616.KkapDu6pJP@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2218616.KkapDu6pJP@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNDc0MWVjZjgtYTFiNS00NGZmLWFkZTktMzFmYTQ0N2E5ZmY2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkhtXC84YituYU9rS3hiQ2Z6SERua0VqYmhQNVoxWU1DR1lQMDUxaDhoQytFPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4 7/7] tests: add checkpatch X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:29:09 -0000 >About the title: > [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw17860 [PATCH, v2] vmxnet3: fix Rx deadlock= Please remove the patchwork id pw17860, and remove the comma in [PATCH, v2= ]. I have remove the comma.=20 For the patchwork id "pw17860", I think it would be better to be remained. = Because if it's removed from the subject, receivers can't be directly told = which patch has been complicated, they must open the email to check it.=20 >The label could be shorter. >"Per-patch" is not needed as every patchwork checks are "per-patch". >"check" is also redundant. >I suggest "Intel compilation" as Test-Label. The label has been changed to "Intel compilation". >It would be better to have a blank line between the status description and= the full report. A blank line has been added between the status description and the full rep= ort. Best Regards Fangfang Wei