From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3624EA0C3F for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:33:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052E316241A; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:33:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2D3162418 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:33:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028AD5C00D1; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:33:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:33:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= EwxGxq+2UxGd62UwmWAO/UsSGjjiwb7/ffCI13MX5MM=; b=qxssZVNeyMnGz8KQ 4y6TQN61vX5gzvvPOkCJoU3LoobZ8hKzk9X9fLZVt2tnrLR/98xjw0S7cPTVJP9y l0PxB0zn+sqCy3DnSDjTiDVLi5sWyJaEGP/bAKVyAZDvSMNi+EMGM929x8Ua/pJQ rxgHI98Ldb62u0D2EKEi5NsI4/iHDMytn4WsfSd4ZS0j/3XQAJUFO3UkY5BlUSu7 tOWemmMRHYVeh8jTxRtfK6Y0Eax2dNtIioJWSGfYy3A5JfNxznQVKzE1RrRPAXGC Zjms5MLCnI4ELN8QECHF3lfbytPsqWrmHYiRh+BxhIUuia5gnk8TgJLoB7iAmdut XpCmGA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=EwxGxq+2UxGd62UwmWAO/UsSGjjiwb7/ffCI13MX5 MM=; b=mPmR/7rOcRe5ovc5FDtIPJktdggAs+zYODK6pxoacVN5FECKO77Zqhe+D LESCIvNwXTrDzqJsyEN8BTMKy76uwo+rGmCPyoFY9PtyiRZgGs4z9B+M+6XJA1Sy 9iSJrTBHYpxkz2bJBzne412gvrRuVegsMufeuMrj8mSUdbzyohr01xujCK3f8IXY Qmwim1k38jfuNiNcpXdcE76oTuQhoX8IIuxMozsAP5EJQS1DOCYLVZ+WactPztqe pjyFIuHfLXTE06nFShdKRfpaGdyY6YCUs10YRucowBEZa41RGD/rLKH+UIpSNCre +Am5m+EUpG/huTKIMA7hcNK1KvS3A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelfedgudeftdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EAC83108005F; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:33:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Brandon Lo Cc: dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:33:53 +0200 Message-ID: <11645160.apamBYaAj9@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <2891195.MathiC2lse@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] What is the reliability of the community lab X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 15/04/2021 20:26, Brandon Lo: > Hi Thomas, > > For the ABI check failure, we were working on a few migration-related > changes that caused this issue. We have fixed the underlying cause and > the rolling migration will be completed soon. The test will be rerun > and reported back up to patchworks as well. You should avoid running tests when the platform is not ready. It was giving false positives. > We are also in the process of adding more monitoring for failure > results that are not limited to only infrastructure failures, i.e. > failures caused by a test's return value will alert us in a separate > category which will allow us to validate the result. The lab seems stopped currently. There are issues for a week now. What are the news today? > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:10 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > We still have some severe reliability issues with the community lab. > > One under investigation, waiting for a bisect, is making the lab crashing. > > > > Another one I would like to understand is about the ABI check. > > Why the test is failing (which is normal) in Travis and GitHub > > but passing in the community lab? > > > > See this example: > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1618283653-16510-6-git-send-email-xuemingl@nvidia.com/