From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFCFA0562 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:39:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE57A1C066; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:39:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B54C1C043 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6094888E; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:39:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=Fn3nlD7CTdRWZhwDUFiaBmXEEVaQrqG2CRDYyuk9BWo=; b=o5qg2Xe3TWI/ 68iglPWUh77yr7ocCLvWjWzlsgxufoep++4SC3HJ5DYq+Pw8kWmaxDKzgkU4mKqK 122Pwq8C1RKgI4/bz5EOR1T/UF/m+ifOYTft6z2ea5DuO1d9GoZ8nGkKI83QXB3q E560boEniS7Cb6ylXON69AK1BeawVVE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Fn3nlD7CTdRWZhwDUFiaBmXEEVaQrqG2CRDYyuk9B Wo=; b=4lsft3ReB+n8OmbI9jK9a1IP6XDoF7xpgsFUUAYvUm+ry9y8BpdJ2ByU7 YMEFq7usR4lga52povV3M7C9XzLYrY92vuxg6DOXyptxlV4p7I36xFUty2enLKIs ZGWIsQPxVwHXtGKLFuBZmpzSZRoAcxIHwF6WXELd3IvNxCNfziytP3qRxwbWHr/v 8F95d4/dqb+/kIKhiSOhDnm6tZ5A60bHuKzlGe1m5BJaHB4XfXdt+XJAg+JBXi16 EgxfHCpbLC8AsrSyhpNxCqqyhUPjNES3pB2bztlQvyHhvz/rgE7jTaSpaQadVeHK LnNNXmXhOLlu1QxEtQcXgIwl7WD5Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrtddtgdduudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrg hssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0CF75306CBBA; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:39:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram , "david.marchand@redhat.com" Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <13671738.mzqWEpnEhh@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1710734.dTVjPilprF@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXT] Re: Wrong Checkpatch failure in Intel CI X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 31/03/2020 22:12, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > I will update checkpatch on dpdk.org. > > The actual change is in devtools/check-symbol-change.sh. I am not sure why it is not picking up. This is because the scripts used by checkpatch@dpdk.org are not updated automatically. Why not? Because I never took time for it. > Hope updating the checkpatch will fix it. > Just for the record, I am testing with checkpatch.pl from 5.6.0-rc5 kernel + todays dpdk.org master. Tell me if you still see an issue.