From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4219B282 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:49:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id t79so108417262wmt.0 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:49:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P2OpHrDHtujejFr90cOPFKpXymGoBe9oxc3s/g7UP10=; b=fEKZq5EaWHHGwUXj8vctRJSlO6610SsKPZ3bMPxPktibangN0+wrRDhyR+fqLEN8wF rhuw8Kah8QoUNYJY5lKYZvUKFDtDQWTxgV164U3jYT+mS+5siu04A+vSYMsR7uAigKJR mZwyMK+KPGSYM1IVxj4S5Bg5M6QU+PKa8dtHVyXFZ6TMz6vGdA18K6FSrbmGcQZELUw1 W5m+xC38UG/L3r5UTo8tOnxND6lzZNJuq6CA8ftyZkghhpn0bCjVPONUhi9EYOnl772Q tXmP7Pe1ygwPflMBJsgifD0A8GKkhvuojc0mm23VeGfxuM04o1Lg9cKrWPHGUpoXZzcs XyHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P2OpHrDHtujejFr90cOPFKpXymGoBe9oxc3s/g7UP10=; b=lXEox6gDVT4ZA0Lka2WHpHnaS5A5XLNlHbG+fi5KXWsRgIId4SoHWXtOwqaG8IdF0f sSh0vL50CbTGdF4ZbLu4hFdy2NmRYrZsWUh5BQVdxvRQbZIF62UiUSvwdij3TJCDvTOW P38qCxLsIRqZ3rUZBAI+C9hgB7nOw2tykiNd9nZf2N/aleDTBFxnD1zjYfV8duI4M0Pw qFYnmeCcVBS8I18qirx6ZSZ5P3Tnp84IfhDlp1SBSaACHUNifs8nzHtBecqUwUFrrUUy YKOtkciStR8rZkiHyJLxhBBvt1xhV0F8Tay2WgljBsdRxYEwVRLYMcM37gWZ9Qj76+yV Rgqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC024DHfCP8lMgaSAd1qZawzyj09JfSYgej6Xfl2dBivfimLpeldT85YjvuR0ZOnPXnZ3 X-Received: by 10.28.69.91 with SMTP id s88mr1533991wma.18.1481618990879; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:49:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l187sm1520551wml.6.2016.12.13.00.49.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:49:50 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wei, FangfangX" Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , ci@dpdk.org, "Xu, Qian Q" , "Liu, Yong" , "Chen, WeichunX" Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:49:49 +0100 Message-ID: <15275169.NpaZ2izZKq@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CD7AD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480599892-14190-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <2218616.KkapDu6pJP@xps13> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CD7AD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4 7/7] tests: add checkpatch X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:49:51 -0000 2016-12-13 08:29, Wei, FangfangX: > > > About the title: > > [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw17860 [PATCH, v2] vmxnet3: fix Rx deadlock > > Please remove the patchwork id pw17860, and remove the comma in [PATCH, v2]. > > I have remove the comma. > For the patchwork id "pw17860", I think it would be better to be remained. Because if it's removed from the subject, receivers can't be directly told which patch has been complicated, they must open the email to check it. I don't understand. With the title "|SUCCESS| [PATCH v2] vmxnet3: fix Rx deadlock]", the receiver see which patch was tested, isn't it?