From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f171.google.com (mail-wj0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EDE558C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:06:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f171.google.com with SMTP id mp19so198831755wjc.1 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:06:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ez6ERNIoamAdtxL0aGQV/bzjEkH23WNk8D9cdc986j8=; b=zwUe+qLzr1u4Uj53fHhPp34u8EIEPQ64oYog42H1QoI8EWzMATGbkfW28K72k09Nq6 prv6H/HI/bK+w7yWFofug+T5JyaWC8eQ9iB1/aGIq8YBI7+i6fTWDsz/YY1fLfdon+dj OjJNiumnHvUSAc0AuXT4JChqCcQDSS27iKHie6mA7uFJViwbSeCSqaaHrDTMfPv2GdZ2 +/eyjwVLROlM7w79Sk71kQ2JtFKGkaEBZzyZI7xNR4k/Y56SLUeNI75gewGPHx19auyX OChjQb7rgjW3/dYtdXM5ZFQOilwI5+khWXCjwn+p/bYVk3tGUR03Fp6V6uy5vBw6JQWd NFFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ez6ERNIoamAdtxL0aGQV/bzjEkH23WNk8D9cdc986j8=; b=Km9W8SfweG3NiY84kklEbzLF3uk6eIPin5ipuN1s9tkwIe4EFpcG1tbmWM2lB2bIqk To5JDUT5f8Xgb+JqtVLOZQ0G/6YnEczs7wrNLYrf80fml5I2Ciww2KTNakQRh4i/rQJU QzXYpb5IWCKlYDr7ArYRIgbLCqXTsbGSrDgD5GoTNbVyB/K/8m3HtceDLuZBQy8eIZxf q6JKANsiQ2hbvHp0UxSXY9zGBge/UdEeNsHsaDFFksYI1NKbK3cEM1H40yORnuhbSK4m q81Ks7ACAtuOBHs9aP/XDkpneWRyHOY7FWEbcFlF+cBsZvhbT5ZTkMr6ys/YpQz0G5dy gePA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03DRSYRoCbSbykxsJHbtnhTlIHrLNK/DI7kjvHZy1Efuz09h6wFdav5KkuiAFJ9g/yH X-Received: by 10.194.3.47 with SMTP id 15mr31146635wjz.17.1480583170049; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dj5sm77156046wjb.34.2016.12.01.01.06.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:06:09 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Xu, Qian Q" , Yuanhan Liu Cc: "Cao, Waterman" , ci@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:06:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1606552.mGUOoSz4ly@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927AFFC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480575999-14453-3-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <20161201072518.GB24403@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927AFFC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] |SUCCESS| [PATCH 2/3] maintainers: update virtio section name X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:06:10 -0000 2016-12-01 08:44, Xu, Qian Q: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 08:06:41AM +0100, checkpatch@dpdk.org wrote: > > > Test-Label: checkpatch > > > Test-Status: SUCCESS > > > http://dpdk.org/patch/17348 > > > > > > _coding style OK_ > > > > Great! This kind of emails is something I'd like to see for a while. > > But I don't like to receive SUCCESS notice. Normally, I'm positive my patches are > > well qualified. The SUCCESS notice only makes my inbox fat-er but nothing else. It is a bug. If the email has the list-id dev.dpdk.org, success should not be reported to the author. > > Of course, I'd like to receive failure notices if any. > Thomas is the owner for the check patch, I wonder if Thomas can add one button or provide options for the patch submitters to receive the mails or not. > Generally developer may not want to receive the SUCCESS mail, but some may want to receive the mail to make sure the test is done and all pass. We may > not simply disable all SUCCESS mails, instead we'd better provide choice for people. If the patch is directly sent to checkpatch@dpdk.org, the author receive the report (success or failure). If the patch is sent to the mailing list, he receives only the failure and can check success on patchwork. I don't see the point of receiving success reports if it is public.