DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-ci] Functional test issues
@ 2021-01-11 23:01 Thomas Monjalon
  2021-01-12 15:04 ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Brandon Lo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-01-11 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dpdklab; +Cc: ci

Hi,

I have a doubt why the patch https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86125/
has some functional test issues in the community lab:
	ci/iol-mellanox-Functional 	fail 	Functional Testing issues

Please could you check what is the cause and try another run?

Thank you



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Functional test issues
  2021-01-11 23:01 [dpdk-ci] Functional test issues Thomas Monjalon
@ 2021-01-12 15:04 ` Brandon Lo
  2021-01-12 15:21   ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Lo @ 2021-01-12 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: dpdklab, ci

Hi Thomas,

We have rerun the tests for this patch and they have succeeded.
The initial failure was caused by a timeout related to Scapy, possibly
due to the machine somehow losing access to Scapy during a test run.
We are investigating to solve the root issue. I will continue to
monitor the test results to ensure that we do not have any more false
negatives.

Thanks,
Brandon

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:01 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a doubt why the patch https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86125/
> has some functional test issues in the community lab:
>         ci/iol-mellanox-Functional      fail    Functional Testing issues
>
> Please could you check what is the cause and try another run?
>
> Thank you
>
>


-- 

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Functional test issues
  2021-01-12 15:04 ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Brandon Lo
@ 2021-01-12 15:21   ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2021-01-12 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brandon Lo; +Cc: dpdklab, ci

Thanks a lot.

12/01/2021 16:04, Brandon Lo:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> We have rerun the tests for this patch and they have succeeded.
> The initial failure was caused by a timeout related to Scapy, possibly
> due to the machine somehow losing access to Scapy during a test run.
> We are investigating to solve the root issue. I will continue to
> monitor the test results to ensure that we do not have any more false
> negatives.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brandon
> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:01 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a doubt why the patch https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86125/
> > has some functional test issues in the community lab:
> >         ci/iol-mellanox-Functional      fail    Functional Testing issues
> >
> > Please could you check what is the cause and try another run?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-12 15:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-11 23:01 [dpdk-ci] Functional test issues Thomas Monjalon
2021-01-12 15:04 ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Brandon Lo
2021-01-12 15:21   ` Thomas Monjalon

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
		ci@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.ci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git