From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7C0A0547 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:05:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBEE41225; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:05:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3796B4120D for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:05:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC70C32009B2; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:05:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:05:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= HBQWw5vZIAc569gtSkoReyuLM7m8vliRzmyeGFhFArA=; b=fjj/2BXSAQcOGAL4 mPA9rQnSzV2aJFrQDVoibzUKW8SlAS7psUE1yNxhjxJQY40WoLoUexgKgH9yZjqX dnOocqejGhTgOzpiythinzwn1rNBBazOJgwWkDMVm7vvPyUKSEJ5orlbZ8cH9YjD 5jPaRAg+ruf9VY/JdZO1q+/pNSlyqUrFiG2ZBlz/CqD7ftL0r62NV8WGD+JY6jyg 7rrdi6EGHZuQ6Zg7KT0heMmcLBKk5KvmiP5DYJyxVfwvM5ziktbg9sGR2IB861mI 9iae6k7WO6eqyGDlhjpk3226rU+6wj02IKbswIV4Z4k1bBDAEf64VEz2cdWyA4op wgUQaA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HBQWw5vZIAc569gtSkoReyuLM7m8vliRzmyeGFhFA rA=; b=r71sAm71f20YXbB2r1wLDBDVs4e1/ChuUORt/ExwLeYgDTafoujB3qv5e y1RmwARWfurQizAUg9XWmh/jQ3xY2kZrgB+ZOMAXLaecv68W73xEqkdBV7p0AF5w vXIVneGaWM7bwBgnBp65YN5FJdJFDeK8r21cKq1Fj5AptvpebY8u15ykEbLa5D2W pJuRb5pl09GdxpIlEhrxlJ72wdLw4AEUbwuwWTYcJMk30Jd+h+fba0mMepkbJGZG y6y1vdiIp4TnaJFjQyUHp7TQzA1288TOwedWREXTwhtTibGrNZJMb7xJHNtzjXIJ JdcjjUSRxcO1gVTe+VtwpaxvU8Iug== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudduuddgleegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeethedtieevhfeigeejleegudefjeehkeekteeuveeiuedvveeu tdejveehveetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:05:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ci@dpdk.org Cc: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:05:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1692874.CEL9UuTRB0@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Community CI Meeting Minutes X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 26/08/2021 15:33, Lincoln Lavoie: > * For DTS CI, should authors be notified of skipped testing (i.e. CI infr= astructure doesn=E2=80=99t support that test suite)? Should this be marked= as a warning in patchwork? Agreed it should do both of these actions, not= ify the author and mark the patch as warning in patchworks. Not sure to understand. If a test is not supported, it is not an issue of the patch, so why would it be reported in patchwork?