DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: ci@dpdk.org
Cc: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Minutes of DPDK Lab Meeting, February 26th
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:20:18 +0100
Message-ID: <1705160.KQmOS6fXmK@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB785C151@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>


28/02/2019 15:49, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> OVS Tests:
> - Jeremy and Aaron are working on setup of the temporary hardware.
> - There are two options for hardware to run this on when the setup is complete: 1) use existing vendor hardware; 2) obtain standalone servers for OVS testing. The OVS team's preference is option 2. It's not realistic to expect a vendor to provide hardware to run a competitor's products so we'd need to find a different way to procure this. Aaron will check with Rashid to see if budget is available from Red Hat. I'll check with Trishan to see if the DPDK project budget could cover this.
> - The OVS focus is on functional tests, not performance tests. The DPDK lab is currently set up so that each vendor has complete control over performance tests & results on their hardware. If we use separate hardware for the OVS tests, we need to ensure that we restrict scope to functional tests so that it does not conflict with this principle in future.

I am not sure to understand.
In my opinion, the purpose of this lab is to have properly tuned hardware
for running a large set of tests. We should be able to run various tests
on the same machine. So the OVS tests, like any new test scenario,
should be run on the same machine as the performance tests.
I think we just need to have a job queue to run tests one by one,
avoiding a test to disturb results of another one.

Why are we looking for additional machines?

  reply index

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 14:49 O'Driscoll, Tim
2019-02-28 15:20 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-02-28 15:24   ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2019-03-04  8:06     ` Stokes, Ian
2019-03-04  8:40       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-04  8:49         ` Stokes, Ian
2019-03-04 13:06     ` Aaron Conole
2019-03-04 16:59       ` Lincoln Lavoie
2019-03-04 17:40         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-08 21:24           ` Aaron Conole
2019-03-08 23:22             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1705160.KQmOS6fXmK@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
	public-inbox-index ci

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox