From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4586239 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:13:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4393320C9B; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:13:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:13:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=hxn61Rna8OTrP3lqfkKXJzE+kW Pe244WJhekUFNtnGw=; b=acAnsajUmkpLO2vXJFP1fUicZx8ZbQB6pjfgQ3XtSy ATMe9iOlwyUXxng2hWxKN6yQHqaDXpDaoora1jq/7Dz3N1HvaC/hKnPmwQ3FENR0 0pv53ohL8eKXyQ2WGnaNmIYbXGTCq/iRqXOl0mKjAjpshehDXVL1SNkZzQH8ueZN Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=hxn61R na8OTrP3lqfkKXJzE+kWPe244WJhekUFNtnGw=; b=XIIPp3azDEYyGI9HqU/Cqz vTAvkdPyY750haI4lmuuiLVnGdq+h5BeevQYFVGFsLA+cu82A3Eh0G7xfBciG8on DeejxkH5vYu8I5XE/tyNsXofxR4ZfpfHX9Z0+9mCZoMf5Ao/4sy+5GWzmjA25T8D U+9UHkwzMforNuV0wO/S+woM4r48jKGPX9ka1MlaoA8vS4Mqcznm3VtN74bNEp87 t7mqX2I7wGSx2l3AGqM8UeBGB3/QxBw8UeeseZndFgGUbkRe0Oe/563hzHRfO7g4 GMtmXtek1GGoZieR0QlVKrDxolTga99PYoKC4flpau2TIY5O9cY7EWqaSWnfnALg == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6BC1243F9; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:13:03 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Gema Gomez Cc: ci@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1705660.ZUhh9PXzrf@xps> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [RFC] test lab database schema X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:13:05 -0000 28/11/2017 17:32, Gema Gomez: > Having the UI as something to think about/implement later worries me. > Representing the data in a way that it is consumable by engineering is > not an easy task, and it is important. It will also affect the database > design. I'd like to contribute an example performance graph/drawings > from a previous life that may or may not be useful: > > http://ci.ubuntu.com/bootspeed/arch/amd64/ Regarding the UI, I think we can use grafana which is highly customizable.