From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f171.google.com (mail-wj0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B0E2C8 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:39:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f171.google.com with SMTP id tk12so66508792wjb.3 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 01:39:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1bts4dBeOfu/HAUsak3d0APtrJAjf0PpoL0rO1azLPo=; b=c+zDTB6pSf0YOJyAJ4iFYYETDcPSxOjFQ1slhd0nodvFm1nBu2yCM66GrqPYyr6Uuv LM/UAzw8UWx1lrF1yUO0y2vw10bIYUwn3lO+TR86oxs1/HA2Q5Mx6LBwEmmB+pXrnGH2 ptYgU1/zUwb7v40gFPuiqZ5GeoQtg2k1mh1ODupoVr87ezBbn1VWMBP90hVemgXLaGIe W6cGUDmhjTAWl87kz2OqKBAYVfO6YwKGBNwlM+KJPPRT9YZ9/CW/xtkSP+WD+y72o3Bk GfljTUs8WO3ZyewAyneG1tXeolQRtLchrImlytrz92OcDueGGB9ott9gHMTjNXnAYG1N OOlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1bts4dBeOfu/HAUsak3d0APtrJAjf0PpoL0rO1azLPo=; b=dgN61VfWDHaqlkmvzLtec+i85xJwI8OUxGGoXeONlm4/QB7ruEQXFcX2CEQPkqn1W7 fQMo7dwwR469QBVkrKspi+G4GHwIsG6cQHVB0tYiO7AgWPjJOrBy32wJVdDzRqYEQWyU Lh+hMUZvW2R1s6fpaslkjL9nhw73GvLC5x9BFTPhNRNo4XaWgvWlqzmRKVgO05g0pkYO 2bKJe3uXmvIcHOImejOgyjipwdVfIW46oYcGins/5id8DrZHKUbPKY7v2BbNI8S/3s83 HBF98V1JobtdAWs/oKqFPShUW8pWE4W1BaBOHUsd27Lx7xyGFj5qxAe81X9YyLWNNEQ6 ldWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC010nOKXr6rHhtxIZpDQlTmtRRYd+K82iLJIckDxOBrkILUBP+DU8r17fkaz09HTTma+ X-Received: by 10.194.18.196 with SMTP id y4mr82106680wjd.73.1481535572744; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 01:39:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ia7sm56134192wjb.23.2016.12.12.01.39.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 01:39:32 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wei, FangfangX" Cc: ci@dpdk.org, "Xu, Qian Q" , "Liu, Yong" , "Chen, WeichunX" Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:39:31 +0100 Message-ID: <1751971.7Nb5rNh5ze@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CB280@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480599892-14190-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <5527892.MAichyp85O@xps13> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CB280@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4 7/7] tests: add checkpatch X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:39:33 -0000 2016-12-12 09:27, Wei, FangfangX: > > 2016-12-09 08:51, Wei, FangfangX: > >> My internet connection is working fine, and also configure http_proxy and https_proxy, but the connection is still timeout. > >> > >> I think that's because the rpc client can't connect to your rpc server. Is there any other configuration should be configured? > > >I've found it is an open issue. pwclient does not work with proxy: > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/47 > > With John's patch, pwclient is working via intel firewall now. > Thanks, John! I've submitted a generic proxy support to patchwork: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/704687/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/704688/ > >> According to my understanding, the "pwid=$($pwclient list -f '%{id}' -m "$msgid " in the script "send-patch-report.sh" is just trying to get the patchwork id, is that right? > > >Yes, if you already have to patchwork id, you can put it. > >It makes me think that the patchwork id should be an option of this script. > > I think adding patchwork id as an option of this script is a good idea. > Because in my per-patch build report, the patchwork id is known. There's no necessary to get it through patchwork with message id. It will be in the next revision of this patchset. > >> Then I just define pwid="17772" in "send-patch-report.sh" directly, run the script again, nothing happened. The email hasn't been sent to test-report@dpdk.org. > > >Are you sure "sendmail -t" is working fine in your environment? > > Actually, I'm not sure about it. In your environment, is there any configuration about sendmail in Linux? Nothing special. > >> I think the function about send-patch-report.sh is just to send patch report to test-report@dpdk.org. It can't generate the following content in patchwork as checkpatch. Am I right? > > >Yes it just an email to test-report@dpdk.org. Then this email is automatically parsed and integrated in patchwork by update-pw.sh running on the server. > >That's how the checkpatch test works (see tests/checkpatch.sh). > > If I send email with my own script, the receiver is test-report@dpdk.org, and the report format shows as below. Is this email also automatically parsed and integrated in patchwork on the server? > > Test-Label: Intel Per-patch compilation check > Test-Status: SUCCESS > http://dpdk.org/patch/17859 > > _Compilation OK_ > > The content about this compilation Yes it would work. What are you using to send this email? I'd like to understand why sendmail does not work for you.