From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09154A0C43 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:54:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA280410E7; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:54:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B621A40141 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:54:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE083200AC9; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 03:54:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 03:54:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh=uWk+LP+jGoSvI IiFamnFawbccl8nzB2b7BE8g60mFZw=; b=bnvsFZLLbOh7rYvb2jeJx+Q6wShjE Y3J3olHD9wKgYjvLzmWYlG51wGB9vm5/A3HPXnUaOENBUbCIMPtsMg91Ivfr50Wz Rj+xF2LEdbbziM7/Iimw+fJVlrLc+UEL1TsTR4PRc4zPVvzX/1RC8F1sw68e+vU1 UG2HyPebt3+f/uuzGKjf/SJ0NFI/+CcOFT/zEmGk7VWbJWQs2MZl1r6JkndObNWG dMHI8CDYCD0gwok5ga1yossnyL8VyRtyZYRRDxejoXBcccFjZ4eOAbR8guiA/LqS IlpEhBGU0V7fZPqYETpcUwH047ggbG4iAiT+w7QcOXBjU4HDIlfLi9JqQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=uWk+LP +jGoSvIIiFamnFawbccl8nzB2b7BE8g60mFZw=; b=KSeqLjCISGTPGQJ78O09to AOyJWkG6tRfmAQWyj8hpsH4IE2vmgecesyO7/u6ezmF84h2+TrhfYLB1dRIJnboE /zp+BSnmhU9rOm7evM76B1i5BeUXFZ3okZrFsOxw9OFBBaWLuPT9jyit+DZ0V4iU dJ7jzwECp/sbZngvFLYl2YVx+O/+gtYik1Db7ohj29Y65cS7IVpHDYkqht0xeNXa 608O8TvZ4zJCSsc/jJA9vTw8+bOze3lxezkCkym1bomtyAqQBjpiI6d+l6K6dkAw nlRA8wEdHrMTbf6Atz2RytVVf3BqByHbPmuEa+6hL0DOzK9CLAeDdv7CY9nnYQIQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrfedugdduvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhho nhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeujeduhedtjeegueejhfetje egtdfgheeuueeivdeuhfeijefhffdufeegjefhkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvg ht X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 03:54:46 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ci@dpdk.org Subject: spell check Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:54:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1756614.3rAJA5Eeto@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, After some thoughts, I think it is not reasonable to check spelling in the CI, because we will always have false positives. Please could we disable "ci/iol-spell-check-testing" to avoid warnings?