From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f178.google.com (mail-wr0-f178.google.com [209.85.128.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6F7FA6B for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i10so86323706wrb.0 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 07:35:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EKKoAt4swltWZeNxkCeJMbcZZGA0JR2aY39dNhPRF3U=; b=HaajHN+GndjPPLPG92zGuFTmOJaFI0ry3H1jHMd30fNLOIr2s9SY6gIAVS3vGQ/5z0 7rSb2HuhUWdrbaUyLo7rzGQ/plxnidDR8caqYWkbH50Nq8EboLTViUi7q3a4v/73dx+c YEbvVdlTt7Ih03u0FnHk4gyksBUgCFjMn3P6X5mv6AtFEATrm48bCMIKzWy7q7l73kBn B7HsoPkSwHCUWdVDnxuh6JnTuvTvBOfW5qS7BILnjCmJPmc5jXioXEvtz/E7erdJx0Hp Mg/vm2H5awSiCGd2T7VW+6f4mDFLpntCbnhh89ABTwuNgWspw778WQpMZK5wxbFhTNlL zwsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EKKoAt4swltWZeNxkCeJMbcZZGA0JR2aY39dNhPRF3U=; b=BE+TA17/cAXzMwgLSK3Q38Ba6gWeV8koY7iDg7D/BsH3jTyJDikBeXyWBdQhRvRYzs z2VgDSkmhkpB3p93StJCga/ZtEVTgxG+NzeqzD5LqiFTYiBAbbI01VgUXKUeL7ggotv3 HaN4kBfDxP5f0Kmzh+q/yYN3e/DWLmziWxB1C7OD5XZPIDOsfoGx1RWW1uY/qBm3Ht2h jOAG0iKExNj8/yIQ0YOsirOD/e2VDPejZSZoQzwuTuy5hanFODt+YU7/RPBjw2tjgcqe JLy52BYmNwdvOeRx3+DjGaqsIYLCXZJxFTy0tZwV9QcovgasmCChcXVvxpSGoBymMKa8 485g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nPjr4Emw3tL4dYv8A2H4VUzAyGnD8KeO3zZyxMEzxFhQkSpbhgBDi+jMH7nvPvFGOQ X-Received: by 10.223.174.183 with SMTP id y52mr3766454wrc.112.1486654500899; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 07:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z67sm19069507wrb.49.2017.02.09.07.35.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 07:35:00 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Qian Xu Cc: ci@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:34:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1762667.L2bTNXicYI@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [dpdk-ci] Fwd: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:35:01 -0000 Qian, There was (unfortunately) a compilation failure on FreeBSD. I think that in such a case, the FreeBSD compilation must be skipped in the automatic compilation tests. Or ideally it should not be considered as a failure when testing a new patch, considering the failu= re was already there. Now that it is fixed in the mainline, would it be possible to re-run th= e tests for the recent pending patches? Note that the patchwork result will be updated when sending a new repor= t for the same patch with the same test label. ----------------------------------- Objet : Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation= under FreeBSD Date : jeudi 9 f=E9vrier 2017, 16:22:37 De : Thomas Monjalon =C0 : Daniel Mrzyglod CC : dev@dpdk.org, slawomirx.mrozowicz@intel.com 2017-02-07 10:44, Daniel Mrzyglod: > This patch fixes error: implicit declaration of function 'getline' >=20 > Fixes: f8be1786b1b8 ("app/crypto-perf: introduce performance test app= lication") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod Applied, thanks