From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346E558CF for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:59:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id i10so145855599wrb.0 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:59:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpodwrczGaLK6MVY/rnFW1fzsTFLfqJGhHTLj2DHtR8=; b=xiQKk1nVSXYnNg2EWBhwbAnNmVU+Q/JO8zte/X09RLXR0aS8JSLNQBjXB1clBpL4Xa 5Qo+EeLgxUpvamDg1vp2Zos8qz8B46yjszxO4TjmNZ/ZlAwNAvjUVwLZmJGfzJfLJObu MMm+wYsvm33ObbHEeiyGZj1VfeKnoFqVJsyeBdejxZP14PITKLD4agxXcWRLFcxD6h3p F0ZBZdXZ3ES8SJXwbXwLtyAxOqm01IkbBy4nwquvhw8Yvx10usOG4eI7QXTZSmUoK51Z IZZknYfp0e5t7C2mZEu4MVmb2AKG744iN+ZaIX6oTik42xTxinOg6q4KnTuDN+kITWOx ejjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpodwrczGaLK6MVY/rnFW1fzsTFLfqJGhHTLj2DHtR8=; b=X/68Wuktz/mj5h1zWr69paMD1u5fqBfeb4iW7xYNlCJc4HIZwy+jynoIcMfYteq7+r lGUlblDjBBgLUKXNqYaV6g6qhJKiMvdFzj0bx6mCMCeFo3H5nE16PL8ucetuXxj43GG2 dtLz+TJBsF4YTWoLhCQfX/ljEsQvAGjTzKPHlCc6mmzzz5O8rKrZVG8CTImpYrLDu7Dt jH2qDNODIspKdXrahv4xhwdIZa5IIKQ6LLz6/8yIGJoQYTXSJUElUSakBkY++FgvMzGh NtH3ZALhIEjXKAmJ1VVQGw0ULThqQJTR7NZe9oUqxNT4H/Y1NXL9kPcDZzp12FqFqnGZ y8Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kp0dDGMskNwmLgU0Mklbz18F3nd3n0ySy/9ZjoDkPtMBEJWGElhtVk0MZ7HE5PyEhb X-Received: by 10.223.147.1 with SMTP id 1mr18047796wro.60.1486976375740; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:59:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l37sm12953297wrc.41.2017.02.13.00.59.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:59:34 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wei, FangfangX" Cc: "Xu, Qian Q" , ci@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:59:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1806668.usxBFJDS7m@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346EA043B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1762667.L2bTNXicYI@xps13> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346EA043B6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Fwd: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:59:36 -0000 2017-02-13 02:18, Wei, FangfangX: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > There was (unfortunately) a compilation failure on FreeBSD. > > I think that in such a case, the FreeBSD compilation must be skippe= d in > > the automatic compilation tests. Or ideally it should not be consid= ered > > as a failure when testing a new patch, considering the failure was > > already there. > >=20 > > Now that it is fixed in the mainline, would it be possible to re-ru= n the > > tests for the recent pending patches? Note that the patchwork resul= t will > > be updated when sending a new report for the same patch with the sa= me > > test label. > =20 > Hi Thomas, > I find that the states of patches are RFC, Accepted, Changes Requeste= d, > Deferred, Superseded and New. I plan to re-run the patch=EF=BC=8C the= state of > which is New. Is that OK? Please, could you re-run also the tests for the Deferred? They will be New when 17.02 is released.