DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>, dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
	ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Trishan de Lanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>,
	James Hendergart <j.hendergart@f5.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:30:35 +0200
Message-ID: <1840339.piZTY7yQz5@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOE1vsP_+aY3G0qjwU5RwkWOexSOUpm0kyPgDsqrD9cxM-=b+w@mail.gmail.com>

06/10/2020 15:22, Lincoln Lavoie:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:03 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > 06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie:
> > > For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until
> > > things catch up on the other branches.  Similarly, if we add something
> > like
> > > GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for
> > now.
> >
> > Sorry, I disagree with this plan.
> > As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights.
> > If a new test is not passing, it should not be added
> > until the original issue is fixed.
> >
> > Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error.
> For Rawhide, the failure is fixed, but I don't think it's ported to all
> branches yet, so how would you want to handle that.  Those branches will
> catch up and the failure would "disappear."

Yes it will disappear, nothing to do on the lab side.

> For GCC 11, that's bleeding edge, so it's more about future proofing and
> how that plan is put together.

I propose you prepare the test, run once and send the report
to dev and ci mailing lists.
Then when we (maintainers) consider it should be fixed,
we will ask you to test again.
If the issue is fixed, you can add the test in the CI.

Would it work?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-01 18:23 [dpdk-ci] " Brandon Lo
2020-10-02  6:51 ` David Marchand
2020-10-02 16:44   ` David Marchand
2020-10-06  9:50     ` David Marchand
2020-10-06 12:52       ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
2020-10-06 13:03         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-06 13:22           ` Lincoln Lavoie
2020-10-06 13:30             ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-10-06 14:07           ` Brandon Lo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1840339.piZTY7yQz5@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=blo@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=j.hendergart@f5.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git