From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59978A04DB for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:29:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAC92142; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F4B1023 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:29:09 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: 8Yyy7fZ7INCteheWxAO2d0xoxYH60fYjRK2knivCz18UrZXGhJSD1JuhsndAnUfn8PpqaLMEga F/GvD70EXU+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9775"; a="165819716" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,382,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="165819716" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2020 04:29:08 -0700 IronPort-SDR: OnxuPUKznNqAPFZwqcuG/nvQ4e7r6YbxAJK21Zvgvso5eleoD/eu4yKZc3nhN6Hu067xXnQTv/ 2ex5BtaCGSfA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,382,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="300678297" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2020 04:29:07 -0700 Received: from sivswdev09.ir.intel.com (sivswdev09.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.48]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id 09GBT6bK025880; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:29:06 +0100 Received: from sivswdev09.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev09.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id 09GBT68Z019971; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:29:06 +0100 Received: (from lma25@localhost) by sivswdev09.ir.intel.com with LOCAL id 09GBT6pN019967; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:29:06 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 12:29:06 +0100 From: "Liang, Ma" To: aconole@redhat.com, maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, ci@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.hunt@intel.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com Message-ID: <20201016112906.GA19060@sivswdev09.ir.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [dpdk-ci] Question about Arm64 clang travis building failure ? X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi All, We hit a very strange Arm64 clang test failure on the travis system. Please Ref: https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds/190252708 and related patch set is http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/80896/ Our change not really has any impact to Arm64, we only add a dummy stub for Arm64 subarch. from the log, we didn't figure out what's the root cause of failure. Any hint for this issue ? Many thanks Liang