From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D011A0567 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:31:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABCB4069D; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:31:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5474F4068A for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:31:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id n9so6782047pgi.7 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:31:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YPNR1WccQqF0leR6ctNLCTbZH7Fp6czJnA6S4TROd2A=; b=nRPkM/3ku5UG5/MZHRCXJ5KERdofIOkaZYizminE9nKctvNMdR0nr8gpBu0wmWvlkr pRANhDXLOqBLRl2rwOPwQdHG/39TvtMCkgL35Ak/IEIs7Xjl3r6Vsl1yYoGAop6um7xh NZg5Y1wP0R4WDjh7uXGTU+qmd/84FnyQXe/2JSK+T08iocrexIGrdb6Vf1baVe9p5HU4 smXT7CRWuKKdtiCWHFh1rb6c2l7OCsXkj52+plIo17seUWJNiVCtQ8/hagS0FtsCdzyJ JhLBPttQs0Zusl8DsIeK1bCf/1/JaI+BfIqZ9fn2lacCxjrisyilgyKizl7ztCRCFuwJ RAtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YPNR1WccQqF0leR6ctNLCTbZH7Fp6czJnA6S4TROd2A=; b=uiFoLbvRwfoBuoslbjBUqqwXhlDdH8HpDW0i4yRaOXSDDRJqMAfRSJKi7FD3T7GODH 9h9RFSPRyBiiCrkkwvc1bzSPjbHZxpZTvfKZnwoVoD2Khw//FAMqTzLQIEX8wOnAC3N7 iGfRzV/kmIoe5r6q7aLfoPnKnNUHYnULwXP69/gl1WxgXmeHu/fl3kajKUTexRCLaagW JRxEgyqd8ddtuSBGiUnKAEKZgCBDj8cqYyXCPOWq98ZX/jWBJMro7lAqtJq/wVNZJirH NT1/tSgCD3UvKUkz2MTRR89O8AhP1LQvk1t3Os0FQXRl+Vu7OglryFZqTviO0VhLiU1Y r2sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533N/W4ZBEK+bJjMU1xVjeuw1s27fcv2XaSlh24I3E+QFXjaQRaM rXwuV1GhA5tHIGkoZuw1L9CmVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJym08FQ/jN5Ycu2mnP8xXFW+UWefrJrnv/NsJfSzDvBt6A+bd7MkMudMhD7COxcbtz8dm/5UA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:942d:0:b029:1f2:cbc6:8491 with SMTP id y13-20020aa7942d0000b02901f2cbc68491mr1579831pfo.53.1615257085465; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (76-14-218-44.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.218.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s194sm11343761pfs.57.2021.03.08.18.31.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 18:31:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 18:31:17 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Jinkun Geng Cc: "users@dpdk.org" , "ci@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20210308183117.627af0e8@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-users] Integration of DPDK into Bazel X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:32:16 +0000 Jinkun Geng wrote: > Hi, all. > Since bazel building system is becoming more and more popular, sometimes we need to integrate DPDK library into a bazel project. However, it seems there is no much support for bazel from DPDK community. The only support at https://github.com/bazelment/dpdk has been outdated. Based on our experience, it can only compile successfully with dpdk-16.04 (i.e. the bazel-16.04 branch). Now DPDK has developed to DPDK 21.02, but the bazel support fails to catch up. > > It would be great if the experts in DPDK community can provide some portable BUILD files to facilitate the integration of the newest DPDK into bazel project (just like bazelment). After all, writing the bazel files can be really challenging, especially if we do not have a very deep understanding of the whole DPDK codes. > > > Jinkun DPDK is on meson now. The core team is unlikely to change build systems again.