Re: Diagnosing CI Failures Question

[Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>]

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 04:27:24AM +0000, Huang, ChenyuX wrote:
> There is a problem with the ci machine and it has been repaired. No problem with the new report 

Is there a way to "re-run" existing patch sets through the
ci/intel-Functional tests? or is the only way to re-submit the same
series to dev@dpdk.org?

Additionally, in the case of failures how do we extract artifacts for
diagnosis? for large tree-wide changes it's quite difficult to rely
entirely on code review to guess what caused a failure.

Thanks!

> 
> 
> Huang, Chenyu
> BRS
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2023 1:00 AM
> > To: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>; Gao, DaxueX
> > <daxuex.gao@intel.com>; Huang, ChenyuX <chenyux.huang@intel.com>
> > Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > Subject: Re: Diagnosing CI Failures Question
> > 
> > Hi Tyler,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:51 PM Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I am a little lost how I investigate failures that come from the
> > > ci/intel-Functional tests. I'm still learning and about how to best
> > > utilize these resources.
> > >
> > > Is there a way I can get access to the artifacts from the failure? I
> > > notice this set of tests is most often the one that fails.
> > >
> > > Are the tests run here publicly available somehow? If so I would lobby
> > > to onboard them to my internal lab to save time by running it prior to
> > > submission.
> > >
> > > I'm also a bit concerned that this exact same failure is produced for
> > > two entirely separate patch series, but without more detail it's hard
> > > to tell if that is just a coincidence.
> > 
> > Tyler, I am lost too... those failures started to appear overnight.
> > This comes from the Intel CI.
> > I have neither log or nor aware of how to reproduce this.
> > Let's ask Intel people who were Cc'd on the report...
> > 
> > 
> > Daxue, Huang, please, can you enlighten us on what is wrong with this series?
> > For the context, see:
> > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2023-March/371507.html
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > --
> > David Marchand
>