DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: Windows Server 2019 in UNH CI Testing?
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:47:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240806164750.GA17212@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvnSUBQFVk==NFYAcERbB-J5WA7JvhbUFy_P+GM-67eEsR7Sw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 12:38:32PM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 1:43???AM Tyler Retzlaff
> <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > i don't see a lot of utility in maintaining the server 2019 any further.
> > i think it is fine to consolidate and use the server 2022 vm.
> >
> > we will want to maintain the build with all 3 toolchains (which i think
> > is what we already have on the 2022 setup?) and continue running the unit
> > tests for the llvm/clang build (and mingw if we already do?)
> >
> 
> Okay, thanks Stephen and Tyler. We will discontinue usage of the
> server 2019 VM, and run the 3 toolchains from serve 2022.

somewhat related when you have time in your schedule i think you can
also upgrade the compiler on the server 2022 vm to visual studio
17.10.x. the non-preview / release version of the compiler now contains
everything needed for msvc + dpdk.

ty

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-06 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25 19:14 Patrick Robb
2024-07-25 21:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-08-06  5:43 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-08-06 16:38   ` Patrick Robb
2024-08-06 16:47     ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2024-08-06 17:10       ` Patrick Robb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240806164750.GA17212@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).