DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: msantana@redhat.com, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	aconole@redhat.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/14] Unit tests fixes for CI
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:34:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2134880.WhL1dmy7PZ@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81c5f665-97ac-c4d0-8281-8f195c63195e@redhat.com>

04/06/2019 17:49, Michael Santana Francisco:
> On 6/4/19 4:59 AM, David Marchand wrote:
> > - the "perf" tests are taking way too long for my taste,
> 
> We should still fix them. However I don't know if we should be running 
> the perf test for every job and every patch on travis. It takes too 
> long. The travis queue will be delayed too far behind for it to be of 
> any use.
> 
> OTOH we could have one job as part of the travis build dedicated to 
> running tests (or just perf test). It's still time consuming but better 
> than running the test on every travis job. For this to work we would 
> need to decreased the timeout for the perf tests as the timeout for it 
> and the travis are both 10 minutes

+Cc ci@dpdk.org

I don't think we should run the perf tests in basic CI like Travis.
We can run perf tests if the purpose is to compare the performance
with previous releases, as some other tests in the community lab.



       reply	other threads:[~2019-06-27 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1559638792-8608-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <81c5f665-97ac-c4d0-8281-8f195c63195e@redhat.com>
2019-06-27 16:34   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-07-01 12:17     ` Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2134880.WhL1dmy7PZ@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=msantana@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).