From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5443DA00E6 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:24:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383CB1BC07; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:24:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7541BA96 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:24:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9E927B2C; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:24:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:24:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=06goT8aFIu+ibrip446KGG3lNQvRnvd5yKAo5rzAcCg=; b=Sjh8Q6gk1SZ6 foyHcqk+1Wmrr72sZP+WV0L0x75J3ksc7K1LOtrEpnmHdRDiRfARpYE2Fm0PY1e1 /qP6i86F4BvJGAI89NfpzA35lOc52c7pQZLCoPCK3Jc32kstu+wY9oV/DdhPc0tk HvaUE6dW/cdag2Xb5vlTaxZJdwxtTtQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=06goT8aFIu+ibrip446KGG3lNQvRnvd5yKAo5rzAc Cg=; b=khvC+PIwdj+Tsx5rnzULhABPXXb+Wg0/MJYVVhVlBAsk1v4OURZbOcFRp HFg2fZenPR+HCbrmYwQjh+gdIR8t/u509ns57FhSFP8yqxeeYrnTeNfu4Mp97jJW UxslK8cIkTNPPZcVtgbTZvBCg6yF4zpD5ArgIvuDMm5UhnUikd2hE6NhqjH7vYXN yM+uBTzg+Hfy1uRLXmoGiMp+HJSc+pqvsq4Wmu0+xB0v71UOQeHEfc3S83uu5iDe hQs7fHrteg3vHwTbXnXGbUt3KOb7iNXy3Gx4d7YV8GFiy3PXRKglPm4Uu4yHf2kb CCEvGxh6Aa21hEFdDNaRDOTljz5sw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfeekgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 04A05E4472; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:24:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jeremy Plsek Cc: Ali Alnubani , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "ci@dpdk.org" Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:24:42 +0200 Message-ID: <2149176.42v1TqmSes@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190216160206.11957-1-alialnu@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4] add script to decide best tree match for patches X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 19/04/2019 18:21, Jeremy Plsek: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 4:16 AM Ali Alnubani wrote: > > Did you guys get a chance to test this version? > > We've switched to using it a few days ago. > Some examples of it switching branches: > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5503/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5499/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5498/ Is it working as you expect? May I merge it in dpdk-ci?