From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17E7A0C41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:28:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEEE40DDA; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:28:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA57C4067E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE4D5C0110; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 06:28:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 06:28:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 2xJCxG84lMb7T6MZ3OnrKWp4dCQH2j9bi38homFnykY=; b=dDF8J/PxlyezSQts WP3sOEFly4KtpRs9AropLzlCAHhaEDYjrXytaZVnpcysbB7ykqXjhAO51Jr5Aag+ AG5kKmZbwa9g3znvDwbqLaBov5zT0BjOXwCz6qftBvwdynhWsZmD+ztx656LjA5o UzprDXtMu+jtvbfDF6Vg/ZqF2CAfZ0rjEmVkernZyW01b0X3KHDKBYACHIW729Dp DOoZyQ1XVqmYSZEecWfeSB0NxGi+FKFvNNRzswA5l33tlzS2AthjR0TPqwx3P1vF 3BV8MOcKM6/GVsiRLTDs94I32k20jKZj2PWSpb0uiIBB6ZZaHyUMaYbgxv2OjfsJ Kc5bAw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=2xJCxG84lMb7T6MZ3OnrKWp4dCQH2j9bi38homFny kY=; b=KZ8E/MyYFGX0IZhCGt3V91PfvEKmUNtadb+FhwOEUB5OWNMnf9Fpm3xId T73iinpwSHtOcGie/ovdiS498C/bjIaDtFyYodaK6YbOHYA8XiqQj2XDbnrFp2dx CXgW+tZzgW4qrjO5CTK83IO2M6K4pPpapcsdiy09d8t13LWy82Mgc0U5Ag9qy97Q lraJeYcAOi8sE2gFAllrmpxzUbGfJhJrl3g/NMJFFw2KbjgAXyh83wEEBAtYZ89x ier4S9r6g5y6lmCQfl1okL4+LlGw6wLsKeNmPdHBumvnAFm9qk/cW9lbYSE7d3pX PU3She0ahtdCCqJC3WWUh3EKcPeaA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudekgedgvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfure dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefge elgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueeiiedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrd hnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 06:28:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: alialnu@nvidia.com Cc: ci@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:28:54 +0200 Message-ID: <2315298.UFNCEpmbWi@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210921143542.4412-10-alialnu@nvidia.com> References: <20210906154537.1299-1-alialnu@nvidia.com> <20210921143542.4412-1-alialnu@nvidia.com> <20210921143542.4412-10-alialnu@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v2 09/10] tools: filter new patchwork IDs by project name X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 21/09/2021 16:35, alialnu@nvidia.com: > From: Ali Alnubani > > Different projects require different checks usually, this > patch modifies the script so that it requires a project's name > which it passes as a parameter with the API end point. I'm not satisfied with this explanation. Please explain what happens if the project is not specified, why this change is done. My explanation: IDs are common for all projects. If we want to check patches of a specific project, we need this filter.