From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04E0475E for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:11:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id g23so19348161wme.1 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p1jaQXsPMyBKJHnuLKe1tOL+C1XccrlirnGNd0ap4AA=; b=C7aV465XLKEtPev0lZ5ggthq9m2zv4MWwLIooCGXYDkQMR9EXP87Qqzc/fAZAWozM/ xvXVvHAsY668ckbXK4xtPvLfkdusDGJFt61tQ8QtusxD3AKWtV5+4Qeetl+P0qLF/M4L uLM0rSQOrCrEL2pgexzbf4XCC9/aInuTH2BTE1fLXeqjsQuufVVeEjwuwmuSOQK0A7ic K2eFea5pvmazkfFh52tik7vIYqdDpv6Jn90qhjDN5YoJxkN+KorWjI9Hm1XMjBxypY5l 6ySnMrlhGGlqPSTK8ra/LvoKu3Wb33rbP4++Ht2tldKIT8XlBd9URE6bgjuVoGmKdBvH RKvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p1jaQXsPMyBKJHnuLKe1tOL+C1XccrlirnGNd0ap4AA=; b=K0kThI8T6DVTvyTSxK5APkeipEAlJNu/+ozPgrsVZp3cuWle89jL3Err6d6dlG9Ux8 l+zDMqN7id/q999UUU/Dff4FWmVfcBul2VIICRyWWtS/aiATLE6seM/eRJu7y00ffamw s27wbHlcXmevvV8Ah2HE2lBgCbSpUhhrWKQF3z2slDSNo8pi7wmhLrc46EJWRohW6PQd dH7I3F1tQcsQZD6FU8BXQcc57Iq6i7uUHKtQg9Or3BtuP88AW2RQHauYVf/LQGqU8qL/ CP7Abh/9V6XXx/Mv0TU2Dk7ub18YjdjHLHmYDxTHY0j/3YxZr3lf6KlXzesz8VEzTFdj uohg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00Dktbv60AkkbG8QXieSoWfbEYz888Sj3sKEjIYGVIwL0XrOnymErgvm9y4cl96Dr8H X-Received: by 10.28.130.66 with SMTP id e63mr5946808wmd.39.1481278288467; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7sm19701526wmd.24.2016.12.09.02.11.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2016 02:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Mcnamara, John" Cc: "Wei, FangfangX" , ci@dpdk.org, "Xu, Qian Q" , "Liu, Yong" , "Chen, WeichunX" Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:11:26 +0100 Message-ID: <2627126.3MAZ6CHQzW@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1480599892-14190-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <5527892.MAichyp85O@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4 7/7] tests: add checkpatch X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 10:11:28 -0000 2016-12-09 10:07, Mcnamara, John: > From: ci [mailto:ci-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > 2016-12-09 08:51, Wei, FangfangX: > > > My internet connection is working fine, and also configure http_proxy > > and https_proxy, but the connection is still timeout. > > > > > > I think that's because the rpc client can't connect to your rpc server. > > Is there any other configuration should be configured? > > > > I've found it is an open issue. pwclient does not work with proxy: > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/47 > > > > Hi, > > I have a hardcoded patch that allows pwclient to work within the Intel firewall. I'll send it on to the @intel.com people. In the meantime, I'm trying to fix the issue upstream. And I'll send a v5 of these patches to be able to get the patch from patchwork without requiring pwclient.