DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
To: "'ci@dpdk.org'" <ci@dpdk.org>
Cc: 'Bob Noseworthy' <ren@iol.unh.edu>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	'Shepard Siegel' <shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com>,
	 'Thomas Monjalon' <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	'Erez Scop' <erezsc@mellanox.com>,
	'Shreyansh Jain' <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
	"Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
	"'pmacarth@iol.unh.edu'" <pmacarth@iol.unh.edu>,
	'Matt Spencer' <Matt.Spencer@arm.com>,
	'George Zhao' <George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com>,
	"Mishra, Shishir" <Shishir.Mishra@spirent.com>,
	'Lixuming' <lixuming@huawei.com>,
	"Tkachuk, Georgii" <georgii.tkachuk@intel.com>,
	'Trishan de Lanerolle' <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sean Campbell <scampbel@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Ali Alnubani <alialnu@mellanox.com>,
	'May Chen' <May.Chen@huawei.com>,
	"Lodha, Nishant" <Nishant.Lodha@cavium.com>,
	"Zhang, Chun" <chun.zhang@intel.com>,
	"'Malla, Malathi'" <Malathi.Malla@spirent.com>,
	 'khemendra kumar' <khemendra.kumar13@gmail.com>,
	"'graeme.gregory@linaro.org'" <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-ci] Minutes of DPDK Lab Meeting, July 3rd
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:22:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB7708B46@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)

Lab Policies and Procedures:
- Bob's draft doc is at:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rtSwpNKltVNyDKNWgeTV5gaYeDoAPlK-sfm8XE7o_5s/edit?usp=sharing. Please review and comment.
- Ferruh suggested adding some form of change control for the lab. This can be included in the Policies and Procedures doc.

Test Setup:
- Current dashboard is at: https://dpdkdashboard.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/
- At the moment, all test cases are reporting errors (either Possible Regression or Apply Error). We need to reduce the number of failures to a manageable level, so that we're only highlighting genuine problems.
- At the moment, test results are compared with a hardcoded value provided by each vendor to determine whether a test passes or not. Agreed that we should be comparing performance versus master to determine if a patch passes or fails. Each vendor needs to update their scripts so that test results are compared against master. Vendors also need to review the tolerance (% deviation allowed for test to pass) for the tests to make sure it's correct.
- Vendors also need to confirm if they're happy for the relative performance data (what % patch improved/degraded performance by compared to master) for their platforms to be made public. This will allow the next level of test results to be accessible to anybody, so they can see which platform tests are failing on, and how much degradation in performance there is.
- When the previous two items are complete (reduce false positives, make next level of performance data public), we'll be able to link to the dashboard from DPDK.org. The dashboard can also be integrated with Patchwork at that time.

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-07-04 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB7708B46@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
    --cc=George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com \
    --cc=Malathi.Malla@spirent.com \
    --cc=Matt.Spencer@arm.com \
    --cc=May.Chen@huawei.com \
    --cc=Nishant.Lodha@cavium.com \
    --cc=Shishir.Mishra@spirent.com \
    --cc=alialnu@mellanox.com \
    --cc=chun.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erezsc@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=georgii.tkachuk@intel.com \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=khemendra.kumar13@gmail.com \
    --cc=lijuan.tu@intel.com \
    --cc=lixuming@huawei.com \
    --cc=pmacarth@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=ren@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=scampbel@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=shepard.siegel@atomicrules.com \
    --cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).