From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CFB1B148 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:58:28 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2019 10:58:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,537,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="134174435" Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.157]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2019 10:58:22 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.205]) by IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.60]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:58:21 +0000 From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" To: "ci@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Minutes of DPDK Lab Meeting, January 29th Thread-Index: AdS4A3wLi1Xy5GspS6qJPyPnxPUHHg== Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:58:20 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB78388ED@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiM2UyOGU2NGEtNWM0Yy00NTExLTliYzktYjgwMjdkNzg0ZjQ0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiYm8wREx3TDgzQ3NIMGNEVGg3U3crakx3bGFhY1FxS2JpRVRuQmp0am54YjlRZFpkNDhIZVFMYkRnZjF0V0w1TCJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-ci] Minutes of DPDK Lab Meeting, January 29th X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:58:29 -0000 Red Hat Test Cases: - We had a separate meeting with Red Hat after our lab meeting today. Aaron= and Rashid explained that they have a suite of DPDK tests, some of which u= se OVS and some of which test DPDK is isolation. These can be easily set up= in the DPDK lab. - We agreed to proceed with this. It's a great way to get additional test c= overage which we've been struggling with for a while. Aaron will work with = Jeremy on the implementation. - The initial goal is to get tests running and results into the database. A= fter that, we can decide how to represent the results in the dashboard and = patchwork. - We will need to make sure that running these tests has not impact on the = current test cases. The assumption is that current utilization is low enoug= h that this should not be a problem. DTS Improvements: - Thomas will solicit community feedback on this. Community help will also = be required to implement any changes. Applying Patches to Sub-Trees: - Plan is to apply patch sets to master first. If that fails, then we'll us= e a script to determine which sub-tree to apply the patch set to. Thomas an= d Ali hope to provide a script this week. - If a patch set is applied to a sub-tree, then we need to agree whether th= e baseline for performance comparison should be the master or the sub-tree.= Agreed that we should compare to master.