From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C97FA0562 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A799161A0C; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B540F161A0A for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:10:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E411E5C01F3; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:10:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:10:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh=BwDcZ3j/2Bt9J wsrhAZbcxhoZiUScSxX3RWC/GqWzNk=; b=mAAYLZQnTsa6Vy4JO0CLpHOvTUk31 xsPE0lwoAADwDwlZXosl89dEHuQP6f00BA7t0+ezdWVajWPt7mUsuKkvZDP/uZdZ W2WrBNsxooF2uXMJZivtLtHRqKPGMiEu+sv7rE8ysw1nUXwBo6A583/Q0XaIPkJ8 DCVwOiDZs/Ob1w/Wx5CcF0YcukJ7/j49noSEFg4BVUMQJ5+QGs7aPRoR4FgMzgdy x3VvFIdBsvNtvHBgrFImCdPeCppju7OFk4mWX+jrVtx4KZ61bLBUeHxB2CY1Iodp tVZYiaMCt9LH6sqzN4QmFKNGSbanZG8uKhQa2x8BFwp7/WVamiRgWiniQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=BwDcZ3 j/2Bt9JwsrhAZbcxhoZiUScSxX3RWC/GqWzNk=; b=eL/5BgpHb9cGPiK4j0stkd TSFiKEE7B/TIhsAwLViu8fGFW+BFmPjqMb25XvAG8/XkxdRQEHXwtTaCq3Evhrp6 STbhHx5wHrwn7uFI/y8J0EzUxvTEnaG05K7jaqH9PzaU1iPbcVqwzy/AePmpx/Rv lkFAShvQ2TeG5bQzJ7xtcuiPgCsJ10vuuy2RS8cO2MWaVHDWOv5JF/SAQYfLFg0D Jx0i115ER6/eHgIoYpMD7C4zgd/DHMqaIRXaSx9eOxcQ6s4LT+5Buml9rC1qR5wZ DlKIzRlcQMmfPDveQ569kMfC472sJPbgo+loE/xxg/dUdWAYbtTtw380+hHyMn9w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeluddggeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhho nhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffgeehteevffeuffefveegle etteeifeeuteetjeetgedvfeeivdetveejgfefgeenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdho rhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhn vght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BC327240066; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:10:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu Cc: ci@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:10:22 +0200 Message-ID: <2891195.MathiC2lse@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-ci] What is the reliability of the community lab X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" We still have some severe reliability issues with the community lab. One under investigation, waiting for a bisect, is making the lab crashing. Another one I would like to understand is about the ABI check. Why the test is failing (which is normal) in Travis and GitHub but passing in the community lab? See this example: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1618283653-16510-6-git-send-email-xuemingl@nvidia.com/