From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979B6A0524 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFC140041; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92E140040 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CE610D0; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 04:15:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Jun 2021 04:15:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh=Bgg/zglCMkTu4 pztY1SZhXU/JI9EVzJWl1SXaAzZXaw=; b=l6bUptpX5ItYqMc9OVPUmF5okX+qa z1ybnYQ/nP9oyoVeSOEFBIBL9sQHbtQPG6fAokrasYi+UiPGt+d3g268LsN1PziN P/ybPfucxlMSJ+8HCQTXRUl0RiXw7VkctGU0c1cIomx8yFxPRuPpSVG9YxY/z0JL muA8Hb6IVvjAAYKe4muTtLKHcwDv2xhORnB1r9vOmm4ZB8uy60FLZRo1P489Ygd3 6iYnB5O1eQPUDSSaaWLKQsA5/qoZ9ioOoSiOwC7ZtX6QhkLhaRJlmtbeayy+f0Rh pn/DlBgdXo10JlC9qFFLr8bokcw1qlLhn1+JLvraJJIKTXUqZ6JONqohw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Bgg/zg lCMkTu4pztY1SZhXU/JI9EVzJWl1SXaAzZXaw=; b=CYrGCj7tRKRIX85iw7IOqy tcJ3SInMp4HV/Y84LqtAwtQVS1KkPD28W5WxX0jfy+E7lYKKOv8pzHRUg4R0tMeh XqNCrP5U7KdRPTeCKoeJm8+KL10V7yPWvH4Tz/uR4SgNGZPV1mePl5MCPMs1fhAx ApeEQ/VHniCkCEReUURUFPwgrT1qxL1hmnKSzIG+B/zsRHnLwnSY45uETkdnSpUx MmIi4qE8lR0LqtPKXolK9MMvJk8FhgT61Fq4PUoLi6vxxuxxJ3EMUNP/J77XrVK9 jAK3Wzc0RcWPxUMBH/K6cEEF4ybUTvmAYKRp9/7W+F5weqnWff2tXSMgT7tgb07g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdelhedgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkggfgtgesthfuredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhho nhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeujeduhedtjeegueejhfetje egtdfgheeuueeivdeuhfeijefhffdufeegjefhkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvg ht X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 04:15:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ci@dpdk.org Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:15:38 +0200 Message-ID: <3023733.gUfOWhsQum@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-ci] ABI check vs 21.05 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi all, DPDK 21.05 was released and we are now in the 21.08 cycle, so it's the right time to update the ABI checks to compare with DPDK 21.05 ABI (numbered 21.2). The config to update is: export DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v21.05