From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org, fangfangx.wei@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:08:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3110646.SlUphBRNZp@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E39273935@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-11-28 07:30, Xu, Qian Q:
> Hi, Thomas
> Pls note that we have updated the per patch Intel compilation check
> report, and it's the per patch build report. You can get the
> test-status result from below report. If you have any comments for
> the report, just feel free to let us know.
Thanks for improving the report.
I have few comments.
The list of test reports is easier to read if every report titles start with
[dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS|
(or |FAILURE|)
I think you can remove [Intel PerPatch Build] in the title.
I feel we need to split the report.
What do you think of having a report per OS? or a report per build?
It would show easily how big is the failure by looking at the counters
and descriptions in patchwork.
The email volume would be bigger but is it a problem?
You need to use the script send-patch-report.sh.
It will make your reports integrated in patchwork.
If I understand well you test every patches of a series at once and send the
report for the last patch of the series?
I think it is a good option while waiting for a real series support in patchwork
and dpdk-ci scripts.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: test-report [mailto:test-report-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of sys_stv@intel.com
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:38 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; test-report@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-test-report] [Intel PerPatch Build] |SUCCESS| pw17274 [PATCH, v2] maintainers: update testpmd maintainer
>
> Test-Label: Intel Per-patch compilation check
> Test-Status: SUCCESS
>
> http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/17274
> Submitter: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:00:50 +0800
> DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:3549dd67152d26e46b136286ee0296a9aaa1923d
>
> Patch17274-17274 --> compile pass
> Build Summary: 18 Builds Done, 18 Successful, 0 Failures
>
> Test environment and configuration as below:
> OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
> Kernel Version:10.3-RELEASE
> CPU info:CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz (2294.75-MHz K8-class CPU)
> GCC Version:gcc (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 4.8.5
> Clang Version:3.4.1
> x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang
> x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
> OS: RHEL7.2_64
> Kernel Version:3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64
> CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
> GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
> Clang Version:3.4.2
> i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
> OS: UB1604_64
> Kernel Version:4.4.0-47-generic
> CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
> GCC Version:gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
> Clang Version:3.8.0
> i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
> OS: CentOS7_64
> Kernel Version:3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64
> CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
> GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
> Clang Version:3.4.2
> i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
> OS: FC24_64
> Kernel Version:4.8.6-201.fc24.x86_64
> CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
> GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2)
> Clang Version:3.8.0
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-debug
> i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
> x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>
> DPDK STV team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <587443$9qu68@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
2016-11-28 7:30 ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-test-report] [Intel PerPatch Build] |SUCCESS| pw17274 [PATCH, v2] maintainers: update testpmd maintainer Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-28 10:08 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-11-29 3:56 ` [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-29 9:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 6:49 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-30 8:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 9:25 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-30 9:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-01 9:00 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-12-01 9:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-01 9:29 ` Wei, FangfangX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3110646.SlUphBRNZp@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=fangfangx.wei@intel.com \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).