From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D8BA2F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:38:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id i10so146513260wrb.0 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:38:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kS2FjPNb2g3ukz22ZQvF1wt+KJFfOrgm0um8TI8aelI=; b=AHs0500a2i2lfYJaxgEJD2q73VenH1D2O3Il+/UxSk66cXm+ydNHIZGqMaxnFC1i/a gjYv3UbIuKQJebiCmtj5HbqE6PMopkg4GdXDH5H6ifCc67j7pF6a4qGjjVyovCsHO2jv frFt8oeWoKIV33jYAgiKB2fKpi3jionR3OAO/jMxludlWnUENNdKpayQVWavmXkyWRKj 7hZiEP6HZd+yTOtrMkpWsmvmbYNPkDwVU2vy9UggkRIgkj0hFH85eQhkqoYojzh9tvOn +eY+yaqIqlDcRrup7n5vJDXnKdrscqxkNRlVAqDNV2ijiJczFAwfx4G2nnPG1tKO//14 up2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kS2FjPNb2g3ukz22ZQvF1wt+KJFfOrgm0um8TI8aelI=; b=S/QY3jaFTJy6J/l9hVxsq/0qo/Mo+7m2q/kSzoLCodDhuvAsqgi6343rb92CLOI5N0 pH9N0bFqEAgrs2mfmG6oCC+mJ6J0PnSnE8aioPDOvU2Gm/n1s/XD4dBCkEIcwoB7CZqk T1wAxd6hrSwHH2etLm7DEKZHyPAunNk8cLjERZZKgNQucqZKPnA4AR9WqpI4C7ZMkOIZ ouOyVSU5si1eHRNFtxCU44uutgvcLpAMLb2Rgety9MaUI3lMLSBbT2FZeWbc67xXpk1u l987fAKD2NjJiDZjEJv3SX5bh5OJul1bGXPrUhscaPAYYW2meIXuIWvVBhQm5CptLNqU v5FA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nKwHjSabBGfKkNuYDezX3OeF3pyE0ReAd0kw4Gw27Vx6ZdsJDgKdQg6xIf3jUjLlFf X-Received: by 10.223.146.228 with SMTP id 91mr18478900wrn.203.1486978680105; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm4603426wmd.6.2017.02.13.01.37.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 01:37:59 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wei, FangfangX" Cc: "Xu, Qian Q" , ci@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:37:58 +0100 Message-ID: <3227200.NmhhPOTuyv@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346EA0451B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1762667.L2bTNXicYI@xps13> <1806668.usxBFJDS7m@xps13> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346EA0451B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Fwd: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:38:00 -0000 2017-02-13 09:20, Wei, FangfangX: > The new patches has been re-run today, I'll re-run the Deferred soon.= Thank you > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 5:00 PM > To: Wei, FangfangX > Cc: Xu, Qian Q ; ci@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Fwd: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app/test-crypto= -perf: fix compilation under FreeBSD >=20 > 2017-02-13 02:18, Wei, FangfangX: > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > > There was (unfortunately) a compilation failure on FreeBSD. > > > I think that in such a case, the FreeBSD compilation must be skip= ped=20 > > > in the automatic compilation tests. Or ideally it should not be=20= > > > considered as a failure when testing a new patch, considering the= =20 > > > failure was already there. > > >=20 > > > Now that it is fixed in the mainline, would it be possible to re-= run=20 > > > the tests for the recent pending patches? Note that the patchwork= =20 > > > result will be updated when sending a new report for the same pat= ch=20 > > > with the same test label. > > =20 > > Hi Thomas, > > I find that the states of patches are RFC, Accepted, Changes=20 > > Requested, Deferred, Superseded and New. I plan to re-run the patch= =EF=BC=8C=20 > > the state of which is New. Is that OK? >=20 > Please, could you re-run also the tests for the Deferred? > They will be New when 17.02 is released. >=20