* [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] Revert "tools: fix tree detection for orphan files"
@ 2020-01-20 15:31 David Marchand
2020-01-21 18:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2020-01-20 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ci; +Cc: thomas, alialnu
The problem with this patch is that some files were with no git tree in
MAINTAINERS on purpose: some files are maintained in the main repository,
but we leave subtrees touch them like release notes or makefile/meson
files.
So reverting it, and adding a comment to document the reason.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
tools/guess_git_tree.py | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/guess_git_tree.py b/tools/guess_git_tree.py
index bc63674..c9eef39 100755
--- a/tools/guess_git_tree.py
+++ b/tools/guess_git_tree.py
@@ -146,11 +146,10 @@ class Maintainers(object):
tree_list = []
for _file in files:
_tree = self._get_tree(_file)
- # No identified tree for a file means that it should go through
- # the main repository.
- if not _tree:
- _tree = 'dpdk'
- tree_list.append(_tree)
+ # Having no tree means that we accept those changes going through a
+ # subtree (e.g. release notes).
+ if _tree:
+ tree_list.append(_tree)
tree = self.get_common_denominator(tree_list)
if tree == '':
tree = 'dpdk'
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] Revert "tools: fix tree detection for orphan files"
2020-01-20 15:31 [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] Revert "tools: fix tree detection for orphan files" David Marchand
@ 2020-01-21 18:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-01-21 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand; +Cc: ci, alialnu
20/01/2020 16:31, David Marchand:
> The problem with this patch is that some files were with no git tree in
> MAINTAINERS on purpose: some files are maintained in the main repository,
> but we leave subtrees touch them like release notes or makefile/meson
> files.
>
> So reverting it, and adding a comment to document the reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Applied, thanks
The solution is better specifying trees in MAINTAINERS
for components which must not be changed in a sub-tree.
Will merge your patches adding such info.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-21 18:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-20 15:31 [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] Revert "tools: fix tree detection for orphan files" David Marchand
2020-01-21 18:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).