From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org, "Wei, FangfangX" <fangfangx.wei@intel.com>,
"Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:26:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3298229.S52HG4ql9W@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927B1A6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-12-01 09:00, Xu, Qian Q:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > 2016-11-30 09:25, Xu, Qian Q:
> > > Then the conclusion is that we just kept current model, 1 report for 1 patch,
> > right?
> >
> > Yes
> > Thanks for the discussion
> > (I keep this discussion in mind in case it needs some improvement)
> >
> > > Also keep in mind some things about the error comparison, we can discuss it
> > again if we see many these issues.
> >
> > Yes
> >
> > > As to the next step, I think Fangfang can check how to update the per patch
> > build result to the patchwork to make the result more visible/readable in website.
> >
> > Yes please.
> > I'm also waiting to apply the patches. Should I apply them right now?
> >
> Do you mean your script patches? I think fangfang may give some comments here.
Yes please
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <587443$9qu68@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
2016-11-28 7:30 ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-test-report] [Intel PerPatch Build] |SUCCESS| pw17274 [PATCH, v2] maintainers: update testpmd maintainer Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-28 10:08 ` [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-29 3:56 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-29 9:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 6:49 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-30 8:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 9:25 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-11-30 9:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-01 9:00 ` Xu, Qian Q
2016-12-01 9:26 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-12-01 9:29 ` Wei, FangfangX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3298229.S52HG4ql9W@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=fangfangx.wei@intel.com \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).