From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f170.google.com (mail-wj0-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1508C5689 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:26:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f170.google.com with SMTP id qp4so198978638wjc.3 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:26:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=56CWGr/CbLRimqXM5OnIau/4ZKQ10+ph76ypo4GV26Q=; b=G7SBvjNjX+68r35X37qD37bp911RZOJWwCY6SpizyCGR4jOltf7O2J1F6GE7FA/u9y etyG7JjBPxuLebIyfSiv/HsDlIZfkQF5HPS4yjcJBLIv5fC0e6BJPqB73JXdZMGRNMYu x/OYmbkiGFQlrJ3gUszm/IKSXQN9bcg0dCAwsA49Wmr65CDSSPod/VIwuzcex4Xf8xV2 Qu/EqiVko+3t56L17h7+nuuZtVFLThpA2cH0saN0cXBZLB1tL/NkS5oMp0cVOf6DILLf BBXa4uxoR74trKmJjpzSWytZy+T6efSqQvpU3wSo4dfOhdr29y8mh77P95Qh1T3ha/wc NTPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=56CWGr/CbLRimqXM5OnIau/4ZKQ10+ph76ypo4GV26Q=; b=VjSiFf9RIkjhTWTRJZHVlm1k9tGX9cEH0szvIXjzNrWS+PUjV+HsLUQv6jLHp/ODb/ Qw/sQbrO7TRQcbvZzfdJk1BBxa7hnlG+hx+VC9G7RUzMyx7Bs9l+rsDmDGfIXiPQIyWp IPIXtSQe4jXKhEeXDWibXQHcoFCmBYKEMYCgJ9Ti/WPAVTLF0yVdtk4zuKzameitUOO4 Tj9qCkRZ7YxgvpUQasmNMIYzXHeaw5Kg99AnxDAa6KmlrfBJsqcx4vKuKV3po4wenTkX BpwvIdFgUtghwHY0EeA9Da+hfFPisJf20zlMGz72o2O6T061HHUdbjfRoJ6gxWWaDjsu MFbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03OMI5k34+d04bYm61p6dxV+szgsOqwQQABDEqa1+Hy9QoWL6llPrYDHFbHv/w2FDmt X-Received: by 10.195.14.7 with SMTP id fc7mr9047346wjd.198.1480584397836; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7sm77209793wjm.39.2016.12.01.01.26.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:26:37 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Xu, Qian Q" Cc: ci@dpdk.org, "Wei, FangfangX" , "Liu, Yong" Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:26:36 +0100 Message-ID: <3298229.S52HG4ql9W@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927B1A6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <587443$9qu68@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> <1683099.tRCFP3oIjm@xps13> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927B1A6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:26:38 -0000 2016-12-01 09:00, Xu, Qian Q: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > 2016-11-30 09:25, Xu, Qian Q: > > > Then the conclusion is that we just kept current model, 1 report for 1 patch, > > right? > > > > Yes > > Thanks for the discussion > > (I keep this discussion in mind in case it needs some improvement) > > > > > Also keep in mind some things about the error comparison, we can discuss it > > again if we see many these issues. > > > > Yes > > > > > As to the next step, I think Fangfang can check how to update the per patch > > build result to the patchwork to make the result more visible/readable in website. > > > > Yes please. > > I'm also waiting to apply the patches. Should I apply them right now? > > > Do you mean your script patches? I think fangfang may give some comments here. Yes please