From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
To: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
"Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"mb@smartsharesystems.com" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/service: fix spurious failures by extending timeout
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:37:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <362f1fd3-2780-ff72-11ed-2c21e920849d@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221006081729.578475-1-harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
On 2022-10-06 10:17, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> This commit extends the timeout for service_may_be_active()
> from 100ms to 1000ms. Local testing on a idle and loaded system
> (compiling DPDK with all cores) always completes after 1 ms.
>
> The same timeout waiting code was duplicated in two tests, and
> is now refactored to a standalone function avoiding duplication.
>
> Reported-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Mattias Ronnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_service_cores.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_service_cores.c b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> index 359b6dcd8b..5260e078c4 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_service_cores.c
> @@ -921,12 +921,26 @@ service_lcore_start_stop(void)
> return unregister_all();
> }
>
> +static int
> +service_ensure_stopped_with_timeout(uint32_t sid)
> +{
> + /* give the service time to stop running */
> + int32_t timeout_ms = 1000; > + int i;
i and timeout_ms should have the same type. Or better, have timeout_ms
as a #define (in ms).
1 s timeout seems reasonable to me.
> + for (i = 0; i < timeout_ms; i++) {
> + if (!rte_service_may_be_active(sid))
> + break;
> + rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
rte_delay_ms(1);
> + }
> +
> + return rte_service_may_be_active(sid);
> +}
> +
> /* stop a service and wait for it to become inactive */
> static int
> service_may_be_active(void)
> {
> const uint32_t sid = 0;
> - int i;
>
> /* expected failure cases */
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(-EINVAL, rte_service_may_be_active(10000),
> @@ -946,19 +960,11 @@ service_may_be_active(void)
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(1, service_lcore_running_check(),
> "Service core expected to poll service but it didn't");
>
> - /* stop the service */
> + /* stop the service, and wait for not-active with timeout */
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_runstate_set(sid, 0),
> "Error: Service stop returned non-zero");
> -
> - /* give the service 100ms to stop running */
> - for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> - if (!rte_service_may_be_active(sid))
> - break;
> - rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
> - }
> -
> - TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_may_be_active(sid),
> - "Error: Service not stopped after 100ms");
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, service_ensure_stopped_with_timeout(sid),
> + "Error: Service not stopped after timeout period.");
>
> return unregister_all();
> }
> @@ -972,7 +978,6 @@ service_active_two_cores(void)
> return TEST_SKIPPED;
>
> const uint32_t sid = 0;
> - int i;
>
> uint32_t lcore = rte_get_next_lcore(/* start core */ -1,
> /* skip main */ 1,
> @@ -1002,16 +1007,8 @@ service_active_two_cores(void)
> /* stop the service */
> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_runstate_set(sid, 0),
> "Error: Service stop returned non-zero");
> -
> - /* give the service 100ms to stop running */
> - for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> - if (!rte_service_may_be_active(sid))
> - break;
> - rte_delay_ms(SERVICE_DELAY);
> - }
> -
> - TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, rte_service_may_be_active(sid),
> - "Error: Service not stopped after 100ms");
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, service_ensure_stopped_with_timeout(sid),
> + "Error: Service not stopped after timeout period.");
>
> return unregister_all();
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-06 8:17 Harry van Haaren
2022-10-06 8:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Harry van Haaren
2022-10-06 8:39 ` David Marchand
2022-10-06 8:54 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-06 8:37 ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2022-10-06 12:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Harry van Haaren
2022-10-06 13:27 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-06 19:33 ` David Marchand
2023-01-26 9:29 ` David Marchand
2023-01-31 17:24 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-02-03 15:03 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-02-03 15:12 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-23 20:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-27 8:41 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-02-03 15:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-03 16:09 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2023-02-23 20:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-27 8:41 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-10-06 14:00 ` Mattias Rönnblom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=362f1fd3-2780-ff72-11ed-2c21e920849d@ericsson.com \
--to=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).