From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2061148BB4; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:35:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFED440DD7; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:35:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b4-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.147]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB2F406BB; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:35:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F921D00120; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 03:35:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Nov 2025 03:35:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1764146149; x=1764232549; bh=LWlRDLxp9wVcN5PjlW3sSxxyN21v8kbt7KXnDPh2wVw=; b= dF/H3hndXViWQLHkctkRnZW3COHzvfoMAFM94GuS8I81CB6r31OmJdJyFhJzJwBp N4AT+kaT9dDgORl/34vEeXWOU/XJmBmPZBiYmiGzrPpHgsN1xUvilyGgkmTzE/2t +mYUfXpieWt0uqAiXxH4hzETFMkSk+lLGy8usrE+4vGcu1juClSerLrJKMWc23UO AJbbpOG9XtRecCiVcHS2dVTsrh0oxBJVhrQbtIreswX2TI1eKuXQZVE23f2y3kP3 lyUv1AEGkYOzSeLdQ6kGO+ByuvpE1Lii5xBOtoRCIMljN9B7Ferxa7mMN3d7yChN fEBrlZdWRdU5AIwuJTatfA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1764146149; x= 1764232549; bh=LWlRDLxp9wVcN5PjlW3sSxxyN21v8kbt7KXnDPh2wVw=; b=s iDc2SrTvdX//52dcaVg66UN0p7KkMXuww3JPzEtr1se+cikzo6e+Ixd01UfzYRXD ksgISExOYVqkLeCh44IHyq4WmBuWzEXne6za224VWicPRVV1iJZvDTDdQDMb1AOi vzqLNk0K0xT0erTGE0+kR3XJH8R9s9+f3gOpdoDP1oGvzz9XyDdLWMmil8uglteL dvzjm4wMKZFgNyscwYZAn3G7JRxWdvCmZy213QtXSRDm4P+MWILm4dvlGko/U3Dk WPJdkm0f9WIg1Cpw/YAjLSn4HDjVM7IpqCOwPKPON/qis3qIbGXbMC9a50FtnMHa Snvjbybewb8ewppaywLOA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddvgeefkeekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeejudevheeiveduuddtveffgfdtgeekueevjeffjeegtdeggeekgfdv uefgfeekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhm ohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehprhhosggssehiohhlrdhunhhhrdgvug hupdhrtghpthhtohepthgvtghhsghorghrugesughpughkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohep tghiseguphgukhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrtghonhholhgvsehrvgguhhgrthdrtg homh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 03:35:48 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Patrick Robb Cc: "Techboard@dpdk.org" , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole Subject: Re: ABI testing post 25.11 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:35:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3858067.Y6S9NjorxK@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org 25/11/2025 19:15, Patrick Robb: > Hello tech board, > > I recall that earlier in the year, the ABI policy was being re-assessed. I > do not recall if there was a conclusion to that discussion and a new policy. > > Is it still correct that once 25.11 is released the UNH lab should produce > an ABI reference from it, and test patches for 26.03 and 26.07 against that > ABI reference? Thanks. Yes, ABI for 26.03 must be compared with 25.11. And ABI for 26.07 must be compared with 26.03, in order to check with symbols added in 26.03.