From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ci-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C0DA0567
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:20:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA69C1BF7F;
	Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:20:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2302BE6
 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:20:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC925D8;
 Wed, 11 Mar 2020 04:20:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 04:20:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=1W8fkPxU40rv6a+AJVpFjfS0HXmmC/uggsRVR9qAXXw=; b=jjRSlSnyuBdx
 uVeXyTVZxZjRYHwLofIIYkga7BSj4RCHpCdLe12FJHyOkZMjel7QS18BgN9DBmXM
 xjoKwNDMIymYJOFYXwbDo6HUwHX9xAKmiMQCka/NHIn5Y2vuOLZWSgmou6oFQuFR
 I0oZLjcaaFTX5SGxYHnUvNCIFXF+d4Y=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1W8fkPxU40rv6a+AJVpFjfS0HXmmC/uggsRVR9qAX
 Xw=; b=tnLzQM2Hq97eDdpK1upSmYPtO6glhAZnnxS61QONn2NJ33ZTvKe8asCbI
 re337B7GjbwyazSgi5xF+vHUImqmD6J1EKFSLzuInawdfqbLRO8NHxmx9WQmHmMD
 ZUU6CLZfEhGdJ0CwGSZxNeVp5X3MzTjQCJJ5gsrgmV/Iw9/7zTOl10RJNruuLA8I
 k4H6r4bcCv+S+8d9gWkzTIttMRSCOKfHLhAOwzECd5vr/65ix8u5JKfQ8TMQ2ldl
 g2S5pMSXmRAPWW9Knhq72ghn6Tlkmtrcx1i1E9JbCE3yJlrDbYwFmZaJFnFB3IdH
 hTmGUmpDUPxKSXOPYSk7PTPVBUrXA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Q59oXhahcWI5HLwu9jdcl59bTF4z1N69hsYwxgrsnTC0rGqPhqludQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddvuddguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh
 necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd
 enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm
 rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc
 fkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr
 rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Q59oXjCK4xbx2xoRaBVbK3k39O-nU9dUEhXCTceusNjqbe-uS0a1Bw>
 <xmx:Q59oXp-s6kLcfJMRsFKp4NqoY3mzm797qd6FPIhFcs2uKdwkRzAGaQ>
 <xmx:Q59oXvRVnSKYEO1XFIjW_DTxW-pgJQ4qm1_VD7S0h1MfxYIC2JKnVg>
 <xmx:Q59oXlwrTQrrj7s-ehCsEM2JPUroBrmX0N5KVV1ZAqJa4l3IielAug>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A3CEE328005D;
 Wed, 11 Mar 2020 04:20:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, ci@dpdk.org,
 sys_stv <sys_stv@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:20:14 +0100
Message-ID: <3892782.1IzOArtZ34@xps>
In-Reply-To: <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EFB97D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <CAJFAV8ytdV6KOaqBqfce6OoEBz_pFarze6aDpBbRAF-nkWxgxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EFB97D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Failure in Intel CI
X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/>
List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "ci" <ci-bounces@dpdk.org>

11/03/2020 03:07, Chen, Zhaoyan:
> Hi, David, 
> 
> The applying failure is caused by our CI is download patches from patchwork. (it's a little slow and unstable in PRC)
> 
> We are working on separating "CI exception" and "real failure". But 1 question, for patchwork report, 
> do you think what kind of result status for any exception in CI workflow?

If you cannot run the test, you should not report it at all.