Re: Email based retests for the Loongarch lab

[zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]

Hi Patrick Robb,

On 2025/7/9 8:49AM, Patrick Robb wrote:
> Hi Zhoumin,
>
> Aaron did approve the get_reruns.py patch for the rebase arg and merge 
> it to dpdk-ci. So, you are good to pull that into your dpdk-ci fork.
>
Thanks for your contributions. I have used this script to support the 
retest with rebase arg in Loongson lab.
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:16 AM zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn 
> <mailto:zhoumin@loongson.cn>> wrote:
>
>>     Maybe you can apply it, give it a run and add a tested by tag to
>>     the patch if it is working for you?
>     Yes, I have tested it and it is working for me. This patch has a
>     little changes in the inputs and outputs to get_reruns.py, and I
>     need to make corresponding changes to our current implementation
>     of retest.
>>
> Okay, thanks. When you get the free time to implement these change 
> please ping me so I know we are ready for any next steps (like 
> updating the labs recheck support status on the DPDK website).
We support the rebase arg now when request to retest. But there maybe a 
little difference between Loongson lab and other labs. We recheck the 
patches on the latest HEAD of the branch specified by rebase arg if has 
or selected by pw_maintainers_cli.py script. I want to know if there 
will be any problems with this behaviour? Is it acceptable?


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3381 bytes --]