From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f182.google.com (mail-wj0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA3D10C07 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:45:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v7so200749101wjy.2 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:45:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8rAB/ZOAloQYqp4EXhJtsawyYDDJMUDpMRzaTOKZ+xw=; b=te7JZ+L71/yzzxWucWHjOx9ykByy4qq7nJo1H56MjK04YnVkxXmJ5QlS61Jib7tMaU EoJEj+6wTge7WXY7uSmUypO/xCVVdg5KPWTwslejgd8fTDmKlGdjEm8uCGKbardNKKLH D1+OeXdr2cfsE6ner2vvSXw62FdC/M7+yy7azaHiEalDHoK/VwiG+z9RLlNalhX2AzoJ V0qc1kcskgEw4WWSSZ6Dk3GOK4dR5Bq72DhNaGIQ0SSwghl+NqTwiA8r3ynAUg+JQnnj WTdYOzfbMjAjbdnx1MJByidHGh1EYNXGnwoSA5BHnAO8jztbbKFGJt9aUDMYg04uuJOm Yp1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8rAB/ZOAloQYqp4EXhJtsawyYDDJMUDpMRzaTOKZ+xw=; b=AqH3Lvxw4DV3N1PFo5KBrmxLMkncXPR6ds4qA1H650AFenQB+N1d68caJWpelBV92f s0NvBZWY9jMrI/UuhfrpAuOeSV20DsozuqHDsEBF9pAT76wELt/s/vs6kzB76qXIAhLH 9yyS3LSmYUyoMPG5KppL0aYXyZaJb4ovHzTmEaCyqOjiGt0z0maBOhe9jFVMpnX5AXT7 8sOjwBsFn1zIDwTrcpu0V7uhnqWPQtm4iCxj9zTFA1aO2v6gTqt7q2MC8QjYvUuKNdrN QA2cI2ejcftfM411dCv8FFXGEYt6noa9GerpULdy5yg0vKbiLYWyZTfetiu70VrdosXg nzLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIbRpsWX6vdTSR/R8Rd70kdJkPSHAx4A0y2IEtQ2e/EXXUSzJDUH5cM6QtL7AaxxAMr X-Received: by 10.194.133.233 with SMTP id pf9mr4318281wjb.15.1482320733097; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:45:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c133sm26861205wme.12.2016.12.21.03.45.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:45:32 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wei, FangfangX" Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , ci@dpdk.org, "Xu, Qian Q" , "Liu, Yong" , "Chen, WeichunX" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:45:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4148425.7qv6Fn5Kiu@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CD7E6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1480599892-14190-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <15275169.NpaZ2izZKq@xps13> <067B569323FEB248B5CB480E1954F4346E9CD7E6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4 7/7] tests: add checkpatch X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:45:33 -0000 2016-12-13 09:24, Wei, FangfangX: > >> > About the title: > >> > [dpdk-test-report] |SUCCESS| pw17860 [PATCH, v2] vmxnet3: fix Rx deadlock > >> > Please remove the patchwork id pw17860, and remove the comma in [PATCH, v2]. > >> > >> I have remove the comma. > >> For the patchwork id "pw17860", I think it would be better to be remained. Because if it's removed from the subject, receivers can't be directly told which patch has been complicated, they must open the email to check it. > > >I don't understand. > >With the title "|SUCCESS| [PATCH v2] vmxnet3: fix Rx deadlock]", the receiver see which patch was tested, isn't it? > > I mean if removed patchwork id, the receiver know one patch was tested, but they don't see the patch id unless open the email. > But we need the patchwork id for two reasons: > 1. For debug, I want to see if the patches were tested in case of leakage tested. > 2. We summary the tested patches status weekly. It is intuitive to see the patchwork id in subject. The script in dpdk-ci is doing the same now. Thanks for your comments