From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EC7A0C4D for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:35:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EBD40042; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:35:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7970540040 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:35:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0795C0153; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 02:35:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 02:35:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= 9oBhecUmU+9VAjsp/fmGFMS5XEN5pvFmnTEnb6giLsE=; b=k9OvD3xffUpBJquF jqC7m4je/oNqmQIoaPcu+HWgd+XY52jPC+HVIAGzfwwoDK+vae0++A8Kf7QllHZG YUWk30swl+0JDd9Hx15ak5XHh2aa4hqty2BD33mndbrWHav9w3a0zSNsWFIvTBD/ SkZEKIlptXbfIXNsY0wx3Y7W1qMonIcoUwaJ7+JlzDuvsgyi7EEQD6Nnka/kbCE9 GzUtYIGWorfzm26hY9+rMjyISVE7AGbMl91SVvyRAOYrckMthi41G2DW5HJoXjaf fpV+U/eywY91yoo1HBhc0gUXVoxDgJw+7Qw6j6OXYNpMb38I6G+kDTJOyWcmY7PW 1NovbQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=9oBhecUmU+9VAjsp/fmGFMS5XEN5pvFmnTEnb6giL sE=; b=BuHgBAtbG3BAI5FynCLwLhE8ZcET81NfHOFZFfwB03zC2KyOr8ZRP9Vyn 3ZRLHyxGikDqA//nNdELaYWHBdhxtrFYcF35Zw9DjP0Tg1SldCszkzPfh0Q+uMDC rE9nQEMKz7W2lGbI12G3C+GOZZNs6SpiDlHAEolfN8rkrN5gOa9uMl8J1jzMaIHl EJ92OPcYqiemS1mq/JD/veZIWJRP3I/1fNS2NZ1eSbb3n+Aqn6zTS0yAVPkCg5FZ BdAbES+TH3RBvK2jeNcH1HcuEpTFb0RUHXBdcdufMZpQyOJpY7O0nH8g6xsgYaoP R43mAzLV6Z4IM7tNWtvwsOEabqhmw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheeggdeltdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 02:35:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Brandon Lo Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , ci@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:36:06 +0200 Message-ID: <41736019.dS1WyQvRiE@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <2177893.HOMrD9adHb@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Community CI Meeting Minutes - July 29, 2021 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 29/07/2021 20:55, Brandon Lo: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:16 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Please propose the exact split with test report names, > > so we can evaluate if the split is convenient, > > and check if it is not too much split. > > Hi Thomas, > > We were planning on splitting the iol-testing label into four labels: > iol-x86_64-compile-testing > iol-x86_64-unit-testing > iol-aarch64-compile-testing > iol-aarch64-unit-testing > > This change would separate jobs into labels based on the job name. > dpdk_meson_compile, dpdk_compile_spdk, mingw64_compile jobs in compile testing, > dpdk_unit_test, spdk_unit_test in unit testing. > > The architectures will be categorized by target instead of host machine. > > If you have any suggestions to get a more convenient split, please let us know. It looks OK, thank you.