From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDA6A04BB for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:03:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D061B3EF; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:03:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2F72C28 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:03:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C70D59; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 09:03:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= UoKTfuwYufzX+3KYis7IurTThZOf8140kEdzmeGuo3k=; b=b7tXEEpND2HTgVag nSLL+DLom6xKCClVrkAp3WuN92jC3p5YDXY62J4HY8xmy08t9GxRZ7nq3iph0+Cp NdknD9AKeVrByOz13T6x6k4lfN6i5jQcXcgHGQv6vh23pjdhTvzwdfOU1Fm8qUdI poIPNcYQPYVbPBSbQuTwrJv9rIp8ft1ipMQ9rpyZfb3LSmjaLv4TweAreeDb/9/u SjTAajA/t3n+3ju5is6YfxM32RtwvAkTlv/sBEkZs6LE0t6FrLBzQ6yCZwxVSGZA Zp7dY0AOi8OOWRwBV5KpqHj1p0ANw4g4ndOI1F5hTesvwtvwpJPraeUUYk8RyzKC R46jQw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=UoKTfuwYufzX+3KYis7IurTThZOf8140kEdzmeGuo 3k=; b=ALaFT/bZsW9z99Ni5Aiv97wAoBOUAf/tmY2w5D40SClGZjKOUmAYS8pHL ZtSZU6i8oJJLQHNsmV2lC64zlfTMl0lPc1w3qpj/98LZUQEerYrYc6iBPJ99Jgrl tJrvw8KUXgGvNSDkfLrNRNOqJIW3HRvXMCLQ4EzCCO+VIvuJkOIH9kKD0Xn7iPmx 7T9apyvvBU8Zr9wnqLY9s7Lj8ILsx4imWHrF9BGjAZjuL5QvlNhmWK/nBOfX+XEv qVjmPHi7P6OGjBP0U6vi02CiSr66ipGCsksyB8qOXuZePyr5f4+zh6YjBt/i4KS4 YdCD+5SXUhTIdt/lNd5zFE7TF0zNQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrgeeggdeitdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E32263280069; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:03:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: David Marchand , Brandon Lo , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Trishan de Lanerolle , James Hendergart Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:03:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4539298.X23b7sF8FS@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 06/10/2020 14:52, Lincoln Lavoie: > For Rawhide, our plan is to mark the failures as warnings instead, until > things catch up on the other branches. Similarly, if we add something like > GCC 11 compile, I would suggest those failures are also a warning for now. Sorry, I disagree with this plan. As a non-regression tool, we are looking for green lights. If a new test is not passing, it should not be added until the original issue is fixed. Please don't add tests if they are failing, giving warning or error. Thanks