From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B82A04A4 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7254B1D15C; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5611C1D9 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 11:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B2B5C00BE; Sun, 24 May 2020 05:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 May 2020 05:50:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh=BRFrobMtzl+AW gGv0m6XYo9pCEG1EO0uiZ4649b61lg=; b=MwaIat2aux5btBy5vvtRnHizrE0rp 9JAhWxPhwP+YaVgbm2foEVUHnp9fXP4k4YsnoZgZcYr5isGqzSWEOYH+Hu7lkj40 wdQBIQi8xUTdGtDqvN3RaC8a5cFPr1q76oYp1IEllJZndghrI+Xi7tFMOPnD56Sn pbSBC9PxDcpWvhKNKafLT3+MP+dxEUoZCjm9BklX8E/YZvWmGcs0kHTXQkGQ3MDc 1V9voGHoB0lkL6RTq0cGct7atDtGBhAou6J8BspMf9S1O2rxS5lUH2/rXYsHHSep kp2B3Om14jktYvRT1sxA0xYSin8C0nuyauOeKruy6DNx4TYb3clOovi3w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=BRFrob Mtzl+AWgGv0m6XYo9pCEG1EO0uiZ4649b61lg=; b=T5IpSAq/ohTII68nttfMWQ 881MBeyQI1ZeCCrzhzOepSv6xY0IdUo7N2WdYpwPa1D5KoG1zhx2Il0K5gN+xf/g wG17BjPBh7DXIpsnO9yYCaLrRVPlGdDI7y4CSfTjQworeRgmNPsdBd0QxzS5BKnU 0UOy+ImaUkjvJoLgMtxAXpX1hqfeGqiEN3odV2mZ93XwNHGYGuJNsKmw1U7v5nTA 3agR2IwdTH/gpRWALE38u5x+kFFTprarJttx1Sbo9PeRlEhMjC89+y19uU3Hama2 JCer6dpEFBFlmcX4CIjestusOf/xrjQQRY/x4Ly402Rj7TExpQjtQCICSig0Eirw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddukedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcu ofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepffegheetveffuefffeevgeelteetieefueetteejteegvdefiedvteev jefgfeegnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtd efrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6B6243066519; Sun, 24 May 2020 05:50:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ci@dpdk.org Cc: j.hendergart@f5.com, Lincoln Lavoie Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 11:50:43 +0200 Message-ID: <5232496.1u8oYCttyy@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [dpdk-ci] CI reliability X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi all, I think we have a CI reliability issue in general. Perhaps we lack some alert mechanism warning test platform maintainers when too many tests are failing. Recent example: the community lab compilation test is failing on Fedora 31 for at least 2 weeks, and I don't see any action to fix it: https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/11040/ Because of such recurring errors, the whole CI becomes irrelevant. Please, we need taking actions to avoid such issue in the near future.