From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA0DA05D3 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 16:29:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A744C80; Tue, 21 May 2019 16:29:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5A1201 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 16:29:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA4B57A; Tue, 21 May 2019 10:28:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 May 2019 10:28:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=mOHSdO5PACyAAw7K+xJ4MI2yH7ZnPP+/x+24ty021EU=; b=EUom01VS8IU/ fSjqm5fj+aPomEKT+LkRWQuFW4c2d/iCcKV8nyo1GUPV3oRF38cWdPU3YjO83YWa pmrarDd+7uwyI7OXlirpICXuF8QQublMqUAPcX9FehZKhTEeyxlUBRfqzBVUf6/F lJXWwhhBbA5nFoV4zkhOitRDZ7H/Md4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=mOHSdO5PACyAAw7K+xJ4MI2yH7ZnPP+/x+24ty021 EU=; b=VkxlFWfN9/UQhfUjBciCza0HqQAjrpUidV0sOwFeocl7EPdN7nCWi6y42 viN9OfzMwBArNZn5x4U/fpv4HdXSXdGfHtFzoRBUmT6kTE+ifl2kuiT+FA1LWpVQ l8HNBx/HhmPNbazNTPr08Zj9VFMmwQhOWSz5fgPmdMuowgabyf2gXibgko03Fyrk pPT4g+gDmqMZE3tPjhuVg+CG52R1S7CbSGWr4L2Op5MAfbbEPItMv9E3WYRbBL3C jDINfft5lksLGzCnsKQ2KhOexY+Cg8Jp0BJ4MQt7+893+gZFckYatOLeRRfwZZ9T pUOlhO06muV3IssHHPsxpPXcSzjrw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddruddutddgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2B32C10379; Tue, 21 May 2019 10:28:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: ci@dpdk.org Cc: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 16:28:56 +0200 Message-ID: <5547763.pTxsDfsT3u@xps> In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB78BC5A0@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB78BC5A0@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] DPDK Community Lab Meeting Minutes, Tuesday May 21st X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 21/05/2019 15:23, O'Driscoll, Tim: > OVS Tests: > - Tests are running on Intel machines. Mellanox setup is in progress. > - Tests are run whenever DPDK master is updated, not per patch set, because the tests take ~4 hours. It defeats the initial goal of avoiding breaks. Why is it taking to long? Can we have a shorter test? > Testing is against the DPDK latest branch in OVS. > - Test results are in the dashboard under the tarballs tab. Once the test setup is complete, we can look at how to make these more readable/more visible. It would be more visible if test is per patchset, integrated in patchwork. > - At the moment, test results go to the DPDK patchwork mailing list. We need to look at how to include OVS maintainers in the distribution. > > SPDK Tests: > - The SPDK team are interested in contributing tests, similar to OVS. This would allow them to identify any compatibility issues earlier, and would give us increased test coverage for DPDK. > - I'll connect the SPDK team with Jeremy and Lincoln to discuss further. Please ask them to prepare a short test.