From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DC7A0A0C for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512DA4014D; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:08:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C9740040; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:08:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA87320093D; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:08:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:08:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= xorpfJdKV2Glaevzw7a0S0M8iKA7623B8/55h16gklE=; b=ZCfZ30BfaM1Piw7B uf+3uZg3wTCR8jZt0jL1/xJ+lCq9RYh3euooZv6ZHwfSPQyGschNK1Ye3r0/d6Rt 2Kk0/IgOMyi1GxZuwxVqODIvd+r9m8CqhamlFS3AEww2OJE7eV4HArfX+aKP0/XI h1RJbmz+BKr+X18N/nziRdbFOplLv0qaLqXPcVRXO8ieT0VITvhpLGoODp3zjMZ8 yckPnBV2gCwpZQs990nDm9j7Y0LQAadHXfkHx1arNoFpIQHffVh4kLTE9A4j6UZ+ OANWDEEOFKL6sUX1BWGL4s2/aZ/nqJ8q1BsFCHyTQ7C0a3tQx81N3h9iObOmcbTS iLYhKA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=xorpfJdKV2Glaevzw7a0S0M8iKA7623B8/55h16gk lE=; b=MzAojYbfJrtrpfWNhf2fSisjnB4X93R/BS8c2Cen7OF2y52+Z3aixFtjv e999jxPRFBzGIU//lrpgdfyt4WawWJbUpD8rpXashA0mbNFz/Rl5sFVfU69DxtDk EHWifaXfg+R5NFQn56zvzabS7cphQQ/YDH81xjnvoZ5R8ZKNHoOPFLz25Dp1bUT1 AtsfhmtpI0W9seKup55pVoTqdoaqKXsPctjrh1rtoQNMSo6ci9MT0l5f0HjyDXs7 qcyZwhAi7OuDYoVostzGV+PaU0iK4XahGlw6v0B8Cx81fhhNBHUyNMDu3XcViQR0 KSweqEa6EBG+Xxtw+IOTLOljqh5VA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrfeeigdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:08:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "lylavoie@iol.unh.edu" , Brandon Lo Cc: Shijith Thotton , Akhil Goyal , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , dev@dpdk.org, "aconole@redhat.com" , ci@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:08:34 +0200 Message-ID: <5939881.oZXA4rTKlg@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1815797.mnHlnkzLNo@thomas> References: <1815797.mnHlnkzLNo@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] crypto/octeontx: enable build on non Linux OS X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 22/07/2021 21:06, Thomas Monjalon: > 22/07/2021 11:17, Akhil Goyal: > > > Enabled build of Octeontx crypto PMD on non linux OS. Other Octeontx > > > PMDs are enabled already. > > > > > > This is to avoid ABI test failure on an OS once we add dependency > > > between a driver which is built to another which is not. > > > > Fixes: 8dc6c2f12ecf ("crypto/octeontx: add crypto adapter framework") > > > > > > > Reported-by: David Marchand > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton > > > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > > > > Thomas/David: please pick this patch directly on main to fix build on CI for FreeBSD. > > Applied, thanks. Please could you re-test the ABI on FreeBSD and re-enable in the CI if the test is passing? Thank you