From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1213A057B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:18:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F751BE8D; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:18:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230DD1BE0C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E875C0113; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:18:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Apr 2020 08:18:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=f0cWKKNpNMoHaaI2YFfPV3E8Cu/9gbATfq84pKOYTZw=; b=mOn5+Zsxr+ft 9+VZ/3hyiTqwIZqLwJ3xX5ExW9qqUq6TStjm6qKB/iAHiQHV55YD1PSK85jmG8dJ yfc0GXZcnYjisbIJcnTW9svuBDK8WGLFrHjHNj4J4nX+uGwSvIRQ3PjZPUjU2oZ4 WaltGXejMwnFz9HmTnoR+nYdxFq05Cw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=f0cWKKNpNMoHaaI2YFfPV3E8Cu/9gbATfq84pKOYT Zw=; b=Ly1QTBxjqAEEcZ6gtZDmsrQyMU7lS2w2ZGKZtYEzNOuMsi7s/wrrFeK8n Voqbeu60uAC2/GVSyYLo5yH/cx0Rf+V6amwUXLziJCXwhxyrBh9cwqpTxSBca66T d7c0npZxpAm5V9kNEXxHhX+vYonODimcD08bmbDzrUWgeRTGjYU2TyFLS26qnDcY mG2UoiNLp5insuXTcEsyQZ6o+BVcyt/Rw7roE7CYs65l4LuXPuhtcQGXaZiHmgXX QGp3VtZisf36blf6X4X0zAuhmxH2KMvhhEfC7b+GgVLnNj7JfsfSl9Too5SuC6QL 5SHF45Q2HUF551VqvmUjNb7JQa0xQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrtddvgdehtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1DCF3280064; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:18:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram , "david.marchand@redhat.com" Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: <6245106.vcMjziH8VY@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <13671738.mzqWEpnEhh@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXT] Re: Wrong Checkpatch failure in Intel CI X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 01/04/2020 13:22, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 31/03/2020 22:12, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon I will update checkpatch > > > > on dpdk.org. > > > > > > The actual change is in devtools/check-symbol-change.sh. I am not sure why it > > is not picking up. > > > > This is because the scripts used by checkpatch@dpdk.org are not updated > > automatically. > > Why not? Because I never took time for it. > > > > > Hope updating the checkpatch will fix it. > > > Just for the record, I am testing with checkpatch.pl from 5.6.0-rc5 kernel + > > todays dpdk.org master. > > > > Tell me if you still see an issue. > > I assume, I can NOT verify now by re-trigger or something. > I will report this issue if it is comes up in future in any of my patch. Yes this is what I meant. Thanks