From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] script to determine target repo (was DPDK Lab)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6814152.1hysv1icOi@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B5C7B6C@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2017-04-13 05:25, Xu, Qian Q:
> To do the per patchset performance test, we need to know that the patchset's target repo. Any thoughts here?
The first task is to extract modified files from lines starting with +++.
Then we must apply some basic rules.
Example: if every paths start with
drivers/crypto/
or lib/librte_cryptodev/
or doc/guides/cryptodevs/
then it goes to dpdk-next-crypto
Later it would be a good idea to store the rules in the dpdk repo near
the file MAINTAINERS, so patchwork could parse them and display the
maintainers and the tree for the patches.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 7:46 PM
> >
> > 2017-04-06 09:57, Xu, Qian Q:
> > > As to the per patchset performance test, as you know, there are many repos
> > for DPDK now, so when a new patchset coming, which repo should it go to?
> > Maybe it doesn't go to dpdk master, but go to dpdk-next-virtio, or others, but
> > automation tool doesn't know that.
> > > As to per patch build, we are trying the patch on different repo to find the one
> > that can pass build, but as to performance test for per patchset, we must apply
> > the patchset into correct repo/branch or else the code didn't work.
> > > Any comments here?
> >
> > For most of the patches it should be obvious to determine the targetted repo.
> > We should add a script in dpdk-ci to get the repo name from a patchset.
> > Anyway, this technical discussion should be on ci@dpdk.org.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-13 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C837C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <HE1PR0501MB21370D6ACD0931D36925D085BD0D0@HE1PR0501MB2137.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3B5BA2BB@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <1564461.MHdNEdeViC@xps13>
2017-04-13 5:25 ` [dpdk-ci] DPDK Lab Xu, Qian Q
2017-04-13 6:46 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-04-25 6:23 ` [dpdk-ci] script to determine target repo (was DPDK Lab) Xu, Qian Q
2017-04-25 6:24 ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-04-25 6:37 ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-04-25 6:41 ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-04-25 6:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-25 6:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-21 7:45 ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-06-21 8:20 ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-06-21 8:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-06-23 8:43 ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-06-23 9:30 ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-06-26 3:47 ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-06-26 6:23 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-26 13:26 ` Xu, Qian Q
2017-06-30 8:41 ` Wei, FangfangX
2017-06-30 9:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-13 8:24 ` [dpdk-ci] DPDK Lab Richardson, Bruce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6814152.1hysv1icOi@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).