From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103A5489A9; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:36:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68FC40262; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:36:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fhigh-b3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b3-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.154]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A224025E for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:36:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-12.internal (phl-compute-12.internal [10.202.2.52]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A3D7A0145; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:36:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-12.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:36:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1761176167; x=1761262567; bh=4aKnyYLr0sc5ouPomQzOvittb4rlTzwGqQKORBslsaI=; b= Y/oVKLJLvlMKvNye1o1kBw9oUl30b0D+mSK+jKiDcmWF1n2JVh0Eer/J7BjKeoPK LUIUS+92VNf+jMbQeHE/O6FK0XNubVxUMG3/eP0zad9CgCrXydP4crQh14cOqmmI mUKPshzakrURBBv0flimk0Ec9/4xPpHs8s/TvGb20JVCAjffIDk1si9Z7NoefJCC uIvt+yYuljyH0QZVeR4d4g7nvvJuiB9DLC4695dOyWaBg51ScP9FzUr6YplLxRu9 LqYY2W9F5nTM0AQElTRx0nS6sYNm91pH0aviptpqNe+9ucfWo4s38FTAdOml/UnT keRL7RbB8jbtpklbWsDD/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1761176167; x= 1761262567; bh=4aKnyYLr0sc5ouPomQzOvittb4rlTzwGqQKORBslsaI=; b=A RX44w6D13YOKHNR0dpPmFT/4GoIa4L7YvVmLF2CelWLoTBq8wa2/wMezP3KP/cBg WNxIhFCYcBxie+GfuOmSOOV69sNmN7uFmEgbYAP2Pi+SuVBQHl37JcFoo9miBbXl 4vejvsWw5G1jF9OpPTACWYa/gNrTbsfDSD49d74Vn0Vzmdg5ZofUaIt8ysLrXTb6 ySsqZltzNvG5XySQi6s2dQ9sEKt45S5PeNYFKi4Cokmk06pHA+108e8iVaHwR6hr sJvLZuS082am2iDoNV+aQcor2sXK4yGW4wviF3Pi9gsTHU8655MzgZDJC+Vkez2h USvKiwTHJ3j9Jotgwn+RA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddugeegledvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpefftdeuhfehvdekleelveffvdelhfelhedvgedtvddvudeuieevtdfg jedvudegfeenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdr nhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepgedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoh eprghjihhtrdhkhhgrphgrrhguvgessghrohgruggtohhmrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohep tghiseguphgukhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrlhhirghlnhhusehnvhhiughirgdrtg homhdprhgtphhtthhopehprhhosggssehiohhlrdhunhhhrdgvughu X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:36:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ajit Khaparde Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Ali Alnubani , Patrick Robb Subject: Re: BNXT patches Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:36:03 +0200 Message-ID: <6873353.2l3rmUXbR5@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, Not related to CI, but the best would be to not wait a year for updating the driver in one series. As you maintain a repository branch, you can merge the patches and wait for UNH CI running on it. Also the GitHub robot can run if you push in a GitHub repo. 23/10/2025 01:05, Patrick Robb: > Hi Ajit, >=20 > That sounds annoying. A sanity check question to start - is there any sen= se > in resubmitting the series and just intentionally delaying sending the 2nd > half of the commits? I.e. >=20 > 1. git send-email /my-patches-dir/* > 2. Send the first 30 > 3. At prompt for 31st patch, pause. > 4. wait 10 minutes. > 5. Return to terminal, send patches 31 through 57. >=20 > Or, if this is not possible, I think there should be some solution on the > patchwork mail server policy side. I think Ali Alnubani from NVIDIA manag= es > it and he is usually pretty responsive with such modification requests. We > could ask about solutions like: >=20 > 1. Add a complete exception to the mail server message rate restriction f= or > emails coming from email addresses associated with DPDK member companies. >=20 > or >=20 > 2. Simply make the message rate restrictions more permissive than they are > currently (i.e. allow 100 emails, not 30). >=20 > If the ideas above will not work, I will have to assess the "bundle" idea > tomorrow when I have time available than I do right now. Most likely it's > technically possible to facilitate but I do feel like simply resolving the > original issue (the mail server is not letting you submit your series) and > allowing the CI system automation to intake the patchseries from patchwork > in the normal way is the ideal approach. >=20 > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 5:39=E2=80=AFPM Ajit Khaparde > wrote: >=20 > > Hi Patrick, > > When Manish was submitting his patchset, > > Looks like because of a mail server message rate restriction, > > only 31 of 57 patches went through in the first attempt > > > > He submitted the remaining patches 32 to 57 in second attempt. > > > > I created a bundle for the series now. [1] > > > > Also a couple of patches were stuck at the gate. > > So a proper build has not happened on the patchset yet. [2] > > Do we have a way to trigger a build on the bundle? > > > > Please advise. > > > > [1] https://patchwork.dpdk.org/bundle/ajitkhaparde/BNXT%2025.11/ > > [2] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-October/921500.html > > > > Thanks > > Ajit