From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7341AA0A02 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A314067B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D34040147 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABAB5C011C; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:15:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:15:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= WyT1bpcRTrbg+/P9adRDgxCRReUfWW+NPB32A0/oIlk=; b=UyxgTHwFTteoNpAB Wr2hULNu48LNcxp4xGETL7booQ4WIH+k1eLI/AWSZN+WIT0oxbno3ht3dgOuy0ZY Im3omkF46nwxG9L041L1qbg8kuqBntQ7HQZariT2dIYd9FYvjSTZgdykQaxO7G06 OG+AKyTnbDghk3ICQQYGbMjokSne/2s3tbArPQOJ08Ii05E/5GSbjMYixxzX7apS IOIVAZZy1+5Z6Bstz90NcJUL0VPyhg2hYuGxMyX32PCVz5U4JNLwKXDFl3S2P4Vt B93XSu2eEm2nEZAny7xzVMRodfTE8u4BH+EQ47L550l0JPBdPSFNo69heZcDBG1w 9liHIQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=WyT1bpcRTrbg+/P9adRDgxCRReUfWW+NPB32A0/oI lk=; b=s5fv2HsgWiDcE0H8xTyuBjSSQMt8j8htafnHFt5C/wGlDXIG3u8ekA51Z ofV+AiTu2dTbC2lzFXDFWKt6JhvzdP5yAGZmxAb6oC3wSnnB9gLtIZC18jd/ng6R RuPL/oKDI4hpg2NY6HqO6F/Xjp8nsuBXCSQNTgWHbHWr8V6DT6iaB0SIUjGtc1Ie NLp10wfv0xzndXzgAi4t6rvAABfAZWiDjGLyBlcQK8sIXhpaY9ArFo5KybRTr0uf pTyUmH3gsmq3+x58ZpRc/rIrIypV3VCzhT2axgUEnkIWzuMdXc3pdDorTE3dC1EI vyoiUF71gCQDhSCBroAp8G80N2DJg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudegledguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeeh teffvdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefge drvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EEBA224005B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:14:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ali Alnubani , Aaron Conole , "Tu, Lijuan" Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:14:58 +0100 Message-ID: <7927872.xfylkBsRoT@thomas> In-Reply-To: <0bdc529461824da6943acc968fb41e3f@intel.com> References: <0bdc529461824da6943acc968fb41e3f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other projects X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 25/03/2021 09:01, Tu, Lijuan: > We sent reports to dts project, and it works, e.g. http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dts/patch/1615946979-23566-1-git-send-email-hailinx.xu@intel.com/ > but we met another question, which mail address should dts reports send to ? > If reports sent to < test-report@dpdk.org>, it will be mixed with dpdk reports, e.g. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-March/183128.html > And an tag [dpdk-test-report] will be added automatically, it's very confused for users. > Therefore, Can we have a separated mail address for dts reports? We need to check which change is required in patchwork processing to have multiple test report mailing lists. It may take a bit of time. Is it urgent?