From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DD8A0350 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:07:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AB740E28; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:07:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456EC4067C; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:07:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7A85C01CC; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 03:07:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 27 Jan 2022 03:07:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=MT83aUj9Qr9C/s JgPLq795Zf4uTLmorrvmpKDIGz1Q0=; b=ATi4hK42H2IWgNpqAZ+TUxJfgJMJGg h4YUnZbfcE8gjN6NpUBqgLm71uRAMMqZVxc96U1b6PRgO98br/cs8EXSWMygF12f RqlDy4SOASopHXIbKUxY0aHgmZf+5iJHsRIMJZHgnT3sXMlBB+bhptufBO3In94r 0XeGdAgucnRPMnfhNLc2ZxEHblFXmFzk4XoomjDtV6erYfPercnSj+OmBExG4jCr FwbNh4KJSF1IJgQhWQZf3wYRz93c9wm8yIDzL15wA6TO/ZoWv0L+4wDZBzcC79eb gE9M6M91d64121YHcQLfQ8Z9XCp83tWSuqmDsJwoB06H7SxP582QH4VQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=MT83aUj9Qr9C/sJgPLq795Zf4uTLmorrvmpKDIGz1 Q0=; b=N6laDSag27fnPR4rMTherg2XDGhNrekD2d57aARQelBR0sBSSZrlxXRjt /sXoUZoqPpgVwWWjo9GcxGs95XlC+xPIcZNpX80B49T9YQvWiya/oblhALpQhDaR GOciWL7v8ILm4RE8S2nx66/sz/yOOocbV+8QdToFKKB64Kjq4NBDC8gKQgPob8id j+oFJzCrICypDjRk/7fl5UD+6P3GW/0aYItxJjewSFPrEBbCttlohcCVIg8JzSDx rCGdppydmAG5DnWUCd4zkLa9e6g4Hr2ZlOx7FSOyj7f8hyz1SshJls++MuYdDroh Z08XIKiLG5NrZlJfRRO8Jq7UpU7QQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrfedvgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 03:07:23 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Aaron Conole , Ferruh Yigit Cc: John Daley , arybchenko@solarflare.com, dev@dpdk.org, Hyong Youb Kim , Ali Alnubani , "ci@dpdk.org" , David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net/enic: add support for eCPRI matching Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:07:21 +0100 Message-ID: <8056915.NyiUUSuA9g@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220114031036.19052-1-johndale@cisco.com> <42788622-4735-9587-04a4-7383f5f4085e@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org 26/01/2022 15:01, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/26/2022 2:00 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 1/14/2022 3:10 AM, John Daley wrote: > >> eCPRI message can be over Ethernet layer (.1Q supported also) or over > >> UDP layer. Message header formats are the same in these two variants. > >> > >> Only up though the first packet header in the PDU can be matched. > >> RSS on the eCPRI header fields is not supported. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: John Daley > >> Reviewed-by: Hyong Youb Kim > >> --- > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_22_03.rst | 1 + > >> drivers/net/enic/enic_fm_flow.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+) > > > > Documentation update is missing, can you please fix? > > > > $ ./devtools/check-doc-vs-code.sh > > rte_flow doc out of sync for enic > > item ecpri > > Hi Thomas, > > Can we add './devtools/check-doc-vs-code.sh' check to CI, what do you think? Yes of course