From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A286E58C5 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:00:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2016 01:00:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,723,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="792962910" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2016 01:00:21 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx156.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.74) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:00:20 -0800 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by fmsmsx156.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:00:21 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.239]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.116]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:00:16 +0800 From: "Xu, Qian Q" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "ci@dpdk.org" , "Wei, FangfangX" , "Liu, Yong" Thread-Topic: Intel PerPatch Build Thread-Index: AQHSSV98PXAtuLsffUiwl1yy5BBYYaDvURPw///Z3ICAAdfAkP//rT4AgACTk1D//4D8gABBZjQA Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:00:15 +0000 Message-ID: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E3927B1A6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <587443$9qu68@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> <2415876.bILSuWsmVC@xps13> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E39278339@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1683099.tRCFP3oIjm@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1683099.tRCFP3oIjm@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel PerPatch Build X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:00:23 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:47 PM > To: Xu, Qian Q > Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Wei, FangfangX ; Liu, Yong > > Subject: Re: Intel PerPatch Build >=20 > 2016-11-30 09:25, Xu, Qian Q: > > Then the conclusion is that we just kept current model, 1 report for 1 = patch, > right? >=20 > Yes > Thanks for the discussion > (I keep this discussion in mind in case it needs some improvement) >=20 > > Also keep in mind some things about the error comparison, we can discus= s it > again if we see many these issues. >=20 > Yes >=20 > > As to the next step, I think Fangfang can check how to update the per p= atch > build result to the patchwork to make the result more visible/readable in= website. >=20 > Yes please. > I'm also waiting to apply the patches. Should I apply them right now? >=20 Do you mean your script patches? I think fangfang may give some comments he= re.=20