From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5742A5E; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:00:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2016 06:59:55 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,606,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1056348286" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2016 06:59:55 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:59:55 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:59:54 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.139]) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.2]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:59:52 +0800 From: "Liu, Yong" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "moving@dpdk.org" , "ci@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-moving] proposal for DPDK CI improvement Thread-Index: AdI3H6aOR4pSQwpSRVuot1dMSoDmOwANjkGAAFgI9wD//8kogP//JvKg Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:59:52 +0000 Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E60312125@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E60310FA1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <3804736.OkjAMiHs6v@xps13> <58200E0A.4010804@intel.com> <2010200.WRchxspeSK@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2010200.WRchxspeSK@xps13> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMTc2YWM0NTgtODczMC00MWI0LTg1NGMtMDE4YmI4NzFmMDRmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6InZcL2VGeW1icVdEMUQ1TXYrT0xcL0xkb0gwWGR4dTZWSTVwQjhLakFvUExFcz0ifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-moving] proposal for DPDK CI improvement X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:00:11 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 6:00 PM > To: Liu, Yong > Cc: moving@dpdk.org; ci@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] proposal for DPDK CI improvement >=20 >=20 > Your concern should be solved: > The detailed reports are available in http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/test- > report/. > When viewing a patch in patchwork, the tests are listed with a brief > result. > The detailed report of each test is linked here. > Example: > dpdk.org/patch/16960 Thanks, Thomas. I haven't noticed that checkpatch function has been integra= ted to patchwork.=20 Look like we can easily enhance per patch-set status demonstration by addin= g more columns like "Checks".=20